Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 11th, 2012, 2:46 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
Finished design with all the modifications should be posted later today.

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 11th, 2012, 7:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
Here is the updated version.

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 11th, 2012, 7:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
not bad. the only real problem you have now, is that the funnel blocks the I-mast radar. it mayb not be higher then the goalkeeper's gun.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 11th, 2012, 7:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
It's most definitely getting there. From a personal perspective I'd possibly split the funnels port and starboard and lower them suitably too.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 11th, 2012, 9:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
I went with Blackbuck's suggestion and split the funnels and lowered them. It just seemed to look better.

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
prairie canuck
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 15th, 2012, 5:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 54
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I was just looking at the shaft and propeller, it seems to have a downward angle. Would this not result in the propulsion trying to lift the stern upwards and driving the bow downwards? My experience is limited to power trims on sport fishing boats but the results of trimming in and out would apply here I think.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 15th, 2012, 5:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
The arrangement here is almost exactly the same as the one on the Perry-class Guided Missile Frigate, and those ships never had that problem.

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
prairie canuck
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 15th, 2012, 6:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 54
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Just an observation on my part but if it's part of an in service vessel then ignore my observation. The effects must decrease as the hull size scales up?
Otherwise it looks good! I see it as a fast patrol with frigate capabilities


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 15th, 2012, 6:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
That's pretty much what I was going for.

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Warhammer-class FrigatePosted: April 16th, 2012, 2:47 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
prairie canuck wrote:
I was just looking at the shaft and propeller, it seems to have a downward angle. Would this not result in the propulsion trying to lift the stern upwards and driving the bow downwards? My experience is limited to power trims on sport fishing boats but the results of trimming in and out would apply here I think.
If anything, this would be moderately beneficial - a ship of this configuration and power level tends to 'squat' and trim by the stern at high power. Remember that this is a displacement hull, and the usual planing rules do not apply.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 32 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]