» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: April 1st, 2012, 6:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
ok thanx a ton

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: April 1st, 2012, 8:02 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Trojan wrote:
lol ok my next question is this (sorry for so many but this is why i made i made such a thread and if anyone else would like to post there questions in here feel free)
If you are desgning a treaty crusier for 8in guns what nation build the best between the UK France the United States (range wise my research said france and who built the best 5.9in, 6in, or 6.1 in guns in general any answers or discussion is much appreciated as always
The USN built cruisers for both range and crew comfort that other nations didn't design for because they didn't need (Range was to get the ship to the fight over the long Pacific distances, while crew comfort and sea keeping were there to make sure the ship could fight well once it got to the fight).

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: April 1st, 2012, 9:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
klagldsf wrote:

Honestly the answer to this question is going to be based on whoever happens to be the best salesman on that particular day. Though IIRC S1850M is either an improved version of SMART-L or simply the Thales brand name for their particular APAR set (APAR is a broad classification of radar type, not a specific set or brand). Or maybe Sampson is the Thales brand name for their APAR set; either way the combinations you listed are both Thales and one or the other would be available.
S-1850 is the licenced production version of the SMART-L. the differences are mainly in parts which can be produced in britain and things like that. specification wise it is about the same.
SAMPSON is not build by thales.

just wanted to see that corrected ;)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Caddaric79
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: April 1st, 2012, 1:36 pm
Offline
Posts: 965
Joined: February 18th, 2011, 6:46 am
"The S1850M is derived from the SMART-L radar in a cooperation structure with Alenia Marconi Systems (AMS). This program concerns the French and Italian Horizon frigates and the Type 45 Destroyers for the English Navy. All in all, twelve systems will be produced with identical configurations. The S1850M is a bit different from the SMART-L. It has a slightly higher rotation speed, improved anti-jamming capabilities, a flexible signal processor and local consoles are used.
Together with the seven SMART-L systems for the Netherlands and German navies, the Thales SMART-L/S1850M has become the de facto standard volume search radar of the European NATO navies."

http://www.thales-nederland.nl/nl/news/ ... 2005.shtml

_________________
"knowledge is like jam, the less you have the more you spread it"
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: April 1st, 2012, 5:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
TimothyC wrote:
Trojan wrote:
lol ok my next question is this (sorry for so many but this is why i made i made such a thread and if anyone else would like to post there questions in here feel free)
If you are desgning a treaty crusier for 8in guns what nation build the best between the UK France the United States (range wise my research said france and who built the best 5.9in, 6in, or 6.1 in guns in general any answers or discussion is much appreciated as always
The USN built cruisers for both range and crew comfort that other nations didn't design for because they didn't need (Range was to get the ship to the fight over the long Pacific distances, while crew comfort and sea keeping were there to make sure the ship could fight well once it got to the fight).
USN cruisers also sometimes sacrificed protection and were top-heavy as a result of trying to sacrifice as little as possible, but they were still good gun platforms. And of course the USN was the only Allied nation to build post-Treaty heavy cruisers in numbers.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: June 1st, 2012, 4:51 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
Can you use RAM in a limited anti-aircraft roll
I read that it has limited anti-helicopter and aircraft capability
Is this true and if so how capable/limited is it?

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kilomuse
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: June 1st, 2012, 5:38 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 4:07 am
Location: California
Well, RAM can certainly shoot down supersonic missiles in flight, so I don't think it's a stretch to see it hitting aircraft or helicopters.

_________________
Republic of Lisenia AU - In progress
Republic of Lisenia in FD Scale - In progress
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: June 1st, 2012, 5:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
I agree thats what I was assuming

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: June 1st, 2012, 6:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
The Block 1 missiles can take a software upgrade to work (better) against aircraft.

The RIM-116 falls nicely between MANPADs (like Stinger) and longer ranged (but still relatively short range) missiles like the RIM-7. This is partly from the 5" diameter body (Stinger is 70mm, Sea Sparrow, 8 inches).

SeaRAM (which replaces the Vulcan cannon of the Phalanx mount with an 11 round RAM magazine) has the advantage of not needing external guidance.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Ship weapons and radar questionsPosted: October 1st, 2012, 10:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
Alright sorry to revive an old thread but it is mine...
For a modern day frigate what is a recommended radar set to go with? Excluding Aegis and it has to be able to guide american missile and if possible more then ESSM (SM-1 and SM-2). Also I will hopefully finally be posting some drawings in the near future and I was wondering what the most preferable image host is. Thank you for any responses

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Return to β€œOff Topic” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]