Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 11 of 21  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page « 19 10 11 12 1321 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 7:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
From here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2833
heuhen wrote:
Type: ASW with ASuW and AAW capability's
Displacement: Approx. 5,000 tons
Length: 396 feet (120.7 meters)
Beam: 52 feet (16 meters)
Drought: max: 22 feet (6.7 meters)

Propulsion:

2-shaft COGOG
2 Rolls-Royce Olympus TM3B high-speed gas turbines (54,000 shp / 40 MW)
2 Rolls-Royce Tyne RM1C cruise gas turbines (9,700 shp / 7.2 MW)

Speed: 31 knots+-
19 knots

Range: 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) at 19 kn; 3,300 nmi (6,100 km) at 31 kn

Complement: 140-280


Armament:

Capability to be equipped with most American and European weapon systems. see drawings bellow.
the standard weapon on them all is

1 * 76mm gun DP
2 * 30mm
2 * 12,7mm
2 * triple torpedo tubes
1 * quad sea sparrow launcher (with reload magazine Oslo class style).


Armor: limited Kevlar splinter protection in critical areas
Aircraft carried: 1+1 × Lynx, depends of mission

The standard with Mk-141 Harpoon on foredeck:
[ img ]

Here with Terne III (Rocket powered depth charges, with space for reload magazine):
[ img ]

ASROC instead for Terne III:
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
denodon
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 11:46 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact: Website, YouTube
Apparently my previous link didn't work so here it is again;

[ img ]

As I said I'm not sure whether I'm going to continue with this design or scrap it in replacement for something MEKO inspired. Not certain yet.

I really wish the part sheets for sensors and radars gave information as to what weapons they are used for/compatible with. All their names are just jargon that I have no idea what they mean and in many cases what years they are from.

_________________
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 22nd, 2012, 3:27 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
The ship's hull look pretty nice! But I am not sure about only installing two SSM onboard and any thoughts on having Point Defense Missile like NSSM and Sea Wolf onboard?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 22nd, 2012, 4:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Looks like a big brother to the Free World Frigate proposal from the 70s. Good Start. For electronics, I can help you when I am more awake.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 22nd, 2012, 4:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
TimothyC wrote:
Looks like a big brother to the Free World Frigate proposal from the 70s.
[ img ]
[ img ]

Wow that sucker is small.


edited to address something brought to my attention


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
denodon
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 22nd, 2012, 5:37 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact: Website, YouTube
I'm thinking I might move the Exocets to the foredeck or fit angled launchers somewhere to give a total of four missile tubes.
As for point defense I'm thinking of putting something atop the hangar rood though I'm not sure yet. I'm thinking I might keep it using just Dutch or European systems where possible to keep more in the NATO theme.

_________________
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jabba
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 22nd, 2012, 6:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1012
Joined: April 14th, 2011, 5:00 pm
Location: Under your kitchen sink...
Here's my design then...

Two variants here, one with hangar and one without. I've gone for a French weapons fit just to be different.

Top views and parts will be updated and corrected at some point. Still very WIP...

[ img ]

_________________
[ img ]
Jabba's Worklist


Last edited by jabba on March 22nd, 2012, 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 22nd, 2012, 10:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
WIP. more and more parts getting into position...
[ img ]

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 23rd, 2012, 8:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
From here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2852
Clonecommander6454 wrote:
[ img ]
[ img ][ img ]
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 23rd, 2012, 9:16 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
both heuhens and clonecommanders fixed in the first post :P (I suppose that was why this was posted?)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 11 of 21  [ 209 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 19 10 11 12 1321 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]