Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 10 of 21  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page « 18 9 10 11 1221 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:25 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
denodon wrote:
I suppose it's a habit I have for drawing the smaller vessels as I see compact designs being far more efficient and cost effective than larger designs which are likely to have systems not needed to fulfill the basic requirements.
As counter intuitive as it may seem, real world experience tells us otherwise. Take the Danish Niels Juel class corvette as an example.
At 84m and 1320tons they're as small as they can be while still being capable of carrying out their mission. This is all well and good, but it comes with a cost. Range is short and they offer a very bumpy ride. Combine this with the fact that it's a two-watch ship and you get a fairly low endurance. If, as the Navy wanted, they'd been 10-20m longer from the start the endurance could have been increased significantly since they could have had a much more sensible engine layout, bigger bunker tanks, better sea-keeping and room for a third watch. That last one is particularly important. During the second Gulf War the Olfert Fischer had to return to port every 7-10 days in order to change crews. (Yes, SeaSwap. Unlike the USN the RDN can make it work) With a proper three watch setup they wouldn't have had to bring the second crew along at all.
In conclusion, by adding a couple of hundred tons of steel (Which is cheap) and a diesel engine (Which is cheap-ish) the Niels Juel could have been at least doubled.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
I still think the drawing is worth pursuing. It'd be a waste of a quality drawing otherwise.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 20th, 2012, 9:29 am
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
MC Spoilt B'stard

Very nice. Is having the oerlikons in front of your Harpoons a wise move?

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 20th, 2012, 9:31 am
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
klagldsf wrote:
I still think the drawing is worth pursuing. It'd be a waste of a quality drawing otherwise.
I would agree with you. If you use the ship as your sensor platform and put a capable Helicopter as the principle ASW weapons system it could work very nicely.

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MC Spoilt B'stard
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 20th, 2012, 3:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao
rifleman wrote:
MC Spoilt B'stard

Very nice. Is having the oerlikons in front of your Harpoons a wise move?
Well u are right , i will move them to the side's of the hangars on the next (last) update.

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
denodon
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 7:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 803
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 2:45 am
Location: Victoria, Australia
Contact: Website, YouTube
Well it isn't much but here's a slight update for the design. I'm still not sure about it and have actually been considering scrapping this design and instead going for something perhaps MEKO inspired. I'm not certain.

[ img ]

_________________
"The first rule is not to lose; The second rule is not to forget the first rule"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rowdy36
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 3:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 942
Joined: August 1st, 2010, 7:51 am
Location: Perth, Australia
My attempt at an Australian ASW frigate:

[ img ]

Vampire Class Frigate
FF-07 Vampire
FF-08 Voyager
FF-09 Vengeance
FF-10 Vendetta

Length: 132m overall
Beam: 14.2m
Draught: 5.8m (over sonar dome)
Displacement: 4,600t
Machinery: CODLAG
4 x Paxman Valenta Diesel Generators
2 x Electric Motors
2 x Rolls-Royce Olympus Gas Turbines (48 MW/50,000 shp)
Speed: 30kn
Range: 4,500nm at 20kn
Complement: 233
Aircraft: 2 x Westland Lynx

1 x 5"/54 caliber Mark 45 Mod 1 Gun
1 x Mk 29 GMLS
2 x Mk 141 quad GMLS
2 x Mk 32 SVTT
1 x 20mm Phalanx Block 0 CIWS
2 x 20mm GAM BO1 Guns
4 x 12.7mm M2HB HMGs

AN/SPS-49 2D Air Search
AN/SPS-55 Surface Search
WM25 Fire Control System

Mulloka Hull Sonar
Type 2031 Towed Array Sonar

AN/SLQ-32(V)2 EWS
Mark 36 SRBOC
AN/SLQ-25 Nixie Towed Torpedo Decoy

_________________
[ img ]


Last edited by Rowdy36 on March 21st, 2012, 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 5:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
A British armed frigate, around 5000t to 6000t.
Armament is
1 4.5" Mk.8 gun
1 Sea Wolf launcher
1 Ikara launcher
2 triple 12.75" ASW torpedoes
2 Wessex or Sea King helos
Speed is 25kts sustained with CODAD engines

[ img ]

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 6:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
put the finished designs in the first post. if your work is finished but is not there, please notify me and I'll add it as well. if it is not but still there, again just notify me ;) I took the ones that were the same for a long time, were stated finished or the ones that just looked finished.

also, the ones that used attachments: please use an external image if it is finished, right now I can't copy them with the quote. (if there really is an reason why you can't do that, PM me and I'll use my own image host ;) )
also, Heuhen, I cut out the more AAW oriented versions of your ship because.... well.... you had almost as many as the rest combined xD

also the question: is there anybody who would like to 'judge' the designs? I do not have the knowledge nor the expertise in this challenge, and I am having my own entry, so I can't do it honest myself, I can only comment :P

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 21st, 2012, 7:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
I can. :D

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 10 of 21  [ 209 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 18 9 10 11 1221 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]