» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 5 of 9  [ 83 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 9 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:11 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
More russian based weaponry/ Items that would be found in Venezuelan and Colombian navies.
Bridge has recived more modern and sturdy look.
Gun barrels have been shortened.
and before anyone says anything, no thats NOT goalkeeper!
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
If it's not goalkeeper then what is it and why do you have that and AK-630M-2 in addition to it? Also if you are going for vertical launchers why bother with the Mk29s?

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
It's either the Chinese knock-of (Type 703 I think it's called) or Mitch's old (and horrible) Twin GoalKeeper.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
Blackbuck wrote:
If it's not goalkeeper then what is it and why do you have that and AK-630M-2 in addition to it? Also if you are going for vertical launchers why bother with the Mk29s?
The single gun ciws are of my own design, based off of ak-630/phalanx with different director, optics, and AEGIS integration. I'm playing with the idea of a modified ak630m-2 to improve firepower, plus it seems as though Russian ciws are more robust in design and could survive the blast of the guns. However they appear to be inaccurate, hence no ak-230. The Mk 29 are ment as AA defense positions for closer targets. The vls is primarily long range weaponry.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:54 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
Thiel wrote:
It's either the Chinese knock-of (Type 703 I think it's called) or Mitch's old (and horrible) Twin GoalKeeper.
Actually yes, the director layout is based off, but different from the Chinese nock off.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 8:55 pm
Thiel wrote:
It's either the Chinese knock-of (Type 703 I think it's called) or Mitch's old (and horrible) Twin GoalKeeper.
You are Horrible ;)
Top
[Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 9:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
ALVAMA wrote:
Thiel wrote:
It's either the Chinese knock-of (Type 703 I think it's called) or Mitch's old (and horrible) Twin GoalKeeper.
You are Horrible ;)
No really, think about it. The early goalkeepers had dispersal issues*, and so had every other CIWS based around that gun.
Now tell me you can build one with two of them on a frame that's about the same size, yet not have dispersal issues and quite possibly mechanical ones as well.And then of course there's the question whether the extra gun even gives you anything in the first place

*Fancy speak for can't hit shit.
Erusia Force wrote:
The single gun ciws are of my own design, based off of ak-630/phalanx with different director, optics, and AEGIS integration. I'm playing with the idea of a modified ak630m-2 to improve firepower, plus it seems as though Russian ciws are more robust in design and could survive the blast of the guns. However they appear to be inaccurate, hence no ak-230. The Mk 29 are ment as AA defense positions for closer targets. The vls is primarily long range weaponry.[/URL]
You do know there's a dedicated VLS for the SeaSparrow? It packs about three times as many missiles in the same volume and it has better reaction time.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 9:51 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
When in doubt, throw more steel at the problem. This should solve all light-caliber dispersal issues.

The SPY-1 layout makes no sense; presumably this has been mentioned many times already, but cannot be mentioned enough.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 10:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
So let me get this straight you have two very different styles / types of CIWS firing (I presume unless you rebuilt either of the guns) two different types of 30mm? 30mm x165 and 30mm x173. If it were me I'd replace all of those mounts and give it six to eight using common ammunition and maybe half of them with missiles and guns a la Palma.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: EFNS H-11 Type Heavy BBGMN DesignPosted: March 20th, 2012, 11:17 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
how does the spy-1 not make sense, because of the other radars mounted on the superstructure? the spy-1 is rigged to detect contacts and relay info to the CIWS and ak-130s while the top mounts are meant for the heavy weapons. As for the CIWS, they are meant to be the same caliber.


Last edited by Erusia Force on March 21st, 2012, 1:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 5 of 9  [ 83 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 9 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]