Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 21  [ 209 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 621 »
Author Message
rifleman
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 8:28 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
nighthunter wrote:
Thanks, did you fix the Label and credits on your SSN? Also this is Era specific, 1970's-1980's not anything after.
think thats them sorted let me know

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 8:53 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Okay her we go:

Type: ASW with ASuW and AAW capability's
Displacement: Approx. 5,000 tons
Length: 396 feet (120.7 meters)
Beam: 52 feet (16 meters)
Drought: max: 22 feet (6.7 meters)

Propulsion:

2-shaft COGOG
2 Rolls-Royce Olympus TM3B high-speed gas turbines (54,000 shp / 40 MW)
2 Rolls-Royce Tyne RM1C cruise gas turbines (9,700 shp / 7.2 MW)

Speed: 31 knots
19 knots

Range: 6,000 nmi (11,000 km) at 19 kn; 3,300 nmi (6,100 km) at 31 kn

Complement: 140-280


Armament:

Capability to be equipped with most American and European weapon systems. see drawings bellow.
the standard weapon on them all is

1 * 76mm gun DP
2 * 30mm
2 * 12,7mm
2 * triple torpedo tubes
1 * quad sea sparrow launcher (with reload magazine Oslo class style).


Armor: limited Kevlar splinter protection in critical areas
Aircraft carried: 1+1 × Lynx, depends of mission


Terne III
[ img ]

Mk-22 GMLS pic fixed!
[ img ]

Mk-13 GMLS
[ img ]

Mk-141
[ img ]

Mk-141 max ASW
[ img ]

ASROC
[ img ]


Last edited by heuhen on March 16th, 2012, 9:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rainmaker
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 9:05 pm
Offline
Posts: 247
Joined: August 2nd, 2010, 6:12 pm
Location: Montreal, QC
Very impressive. I like this design a lot. I'd be very interested in seeing a Canadianized version of this type to serve as an interim ASW escort between the Iroquois and Halifax classes. Certainly four of these could've replaced the Mackenzie-class destroyers, and also given MARCOM some serious air-defence capabilities before the Iroquois-class received the TRUMP refits in the mid-nineties.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 9:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
TimothyC wrote:
Nighthunter - COSAG or COGAS?
COGAS

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 9:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
propulsion system: Combined steam and Gas turbine or Combined Gas Turbine?

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 9:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
I got it, yay for wikipedia! Thanks though rifleman.

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 10:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Have updated my list of NATO ASW with this one:

(See above or click this link!)
http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... 141max.png


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 11:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
I wonder were these designs to act as Hunter Killer groups or to work as convoy escorts. It would be interesting to see what their support vessels would have been. I'm thinking Replenishment, C3I etc

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 15th, 2012, 11:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
WM20 series ought to be able to illuminate for Sea Sparrow, heuhen. No need for both that and the separate illuminator (which means you can put the one you keep in a better position!).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: NATO ASW Design ChallengePosted: March 16th, 2012, 12:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
erik_t wrote:
WM20 series ought to be able to illuminate for Sea Sparrow, heuhen. No need for both that and the separate illuminator (which means you can put the one you keep in a better position!).
the idea was that the Sea Sparrow used a separate system for faster response time, but i agree with you that I can use the egg for that to.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 21  [ 209 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 621 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]