Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 2:51 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Attachment:
Ground Effect FAC.png
A little something I threw together as an exercise.
This is my first attempt at drawing camouflage, so I'm especially interested in anything you might have to say about it,
Armament consists of one Bofors 57mm Mk 3, four Saab RBS-15's and 12 ESSMs.
So, critique away.

Oh, and if you're going to do it ColombaMike style, post the picture as an attachment, since I wont be able to see it otherwise.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 6:49 am
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
Is this an Air Cushion vehicle, like an armed LCAC?

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 12:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Nope. Ground effect, similar, but not the same. It's a bit like a catamaran with an ACV strapped to its underbelly. It has many of the advantages of an ACV, though it isn't amphibious, however, due to the fact that the side hulls pierces the water, it's far more stable and can use more conventional (and efficient) means of propulsion.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 3:53 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
deleted


Last edited by Colombamike on March 30th, 2011, 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 7:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Well, here why I believe I have enough room for the ESSM.
Attachment:
Ground Effect FAC - Improved Stealth.png
As you can see, I have a lot of beam to play with.
I followed your suggestion and integrated the launchers into the superstructure.
It's main mission is ASuW.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Vossiej
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 7:43 pm
Offline
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:29 am
Location: The Netherlands
If you have such a large beam, and it's main role is ASuW, I would make the superstructure a little less wide, and add some more anti-ship missiles (four on each side).

_________________
“The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person who is doing it.”


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 7:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'd like to, but the crew has to go somewhere too. And since what little space there is in the hull is given over to fuel, oil, water and ballast tanks, they have to bunk down in the superstructure.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: July 31st, 2010, 9:57 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
You could make the superstructure sorta hexagonal and have the launchers further towards the edges possibly with the outside of the enclosed launchers being flush with the rest of the hull below it?

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: August 1st, 2010, 6:58 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
deleted


Last edited by Colombamike on March 30th, 2011, 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Ground Effect FACPosted: August 1st, 2010, 9:44 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
I think the 57 has a minimum deck penetration of 1.9m if you want anything more than the 120rds in the gun itself. You could get away with an electro-optical director for the 57 seeing as where this operates too me thinks.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]