Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 6  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
Author Message
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 1st, 2012, 6:00 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
Colosseum wrote:
How survivable would the average offshore platform be against missiles and gunfire?
Depends: are they currently full of oil or not?
Aside from that, those rigs are designed to withstand conditions that most ships run from. As long as you offload the flammables, the rig should be able to take one or two hits- which is about what any warship would be able to take. Remember, the rig is generally 'hollow', and a lot of the blast force that would be contained in a ship will be lost in atmosphere on the rig!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 1st, 2012, 7:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Well keep in mind, as I somewhat alluded to before, US forces did engage armed oil rigs in the Gulf/Hormuz.

Here's a bunch of links you guys might want to read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Earnest_Will
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Prime_Chance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eager_Glacier
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Nimble_Archer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Praying_Mantis


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 1st, 2012, 7:44 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
This line sticks out:
Quote:
The high-explosive shells did negligible blast damage to the steel-lattice platforms, but eventually set them ablaze.
It seems that the platforms held up fairly well, given the circumstances and the amount of artillery directed at them. It would be interesting to see how many shells were fired before any concrete effect was obtained... like the fire actually starting.

I won't say that they would make any kind of lasting fortifications- but used properly (which it sounds like the Iranians didn't do) they could have made a heck of a dent in an approaching force.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 1st, 2012, 7:46 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Oh hey look someone read those links :P


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 1st, 2012, 9:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Carthaginian wrote:
I won't say that they would make any kind of lasting fortifications- but used properly (which it sounds like the Iranians didn't do) they could have made a heck of a dent in an approaching force.
In limited war perhaps. In an all out war they'd be destroyed by long ranged missiles or submarines as early in the war as possible.
Like you said, "they're built to resist stuff most ships will run from" because they can't run anywhere which makes them perfect targets for cruise and ballistic missiles.
In an all out war keeping you from getting the oil is more important to your enemy than for him to capture it.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 1st, 2012, 1:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
guys let's do this thing no history for now,let me do another ships because we go 4 pages only because of this "weird" history i created. ;)

still a gigantic job to do :shock:

If you have any ideas of ships or history send me PM it will be very apreciated :)

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 2nd, 2012, 9:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
guys i reduced the length of the BCG and now it's classified as CGN and i reduced the number of VLS and the deck for helicopters and will be built in 95' maybe...and i have a model to another BCG(soon :( ).

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 2nd, 2012, 9:22 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Anything above a corvette in size is going to be overkill for defending drilling rigs.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 2nd, 2012, 9:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
If one is insistant about a whole ship for the task, something like a LPH would seem to make a great deal more sense. Oil rigs are distributed targets, so fast and numerous defensive craft (ie helos) would seem appropriate. Anything that couldn't be whacked with a few helo-launched SSMs is so powerful a fleet in being as to demand counter from one's own major forces.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Federative Republic of BrazilPosted: March 2nd, 2012, 10:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
guys forget about oil rigs for now lets' concentrate on the ships :)

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 6  [ 60 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]