Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 13  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 โ€ฆ 13 »
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 2:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Great to see you back Miho.

If you don't mind, I made a few exceptionally minor adjustments to your drawing (fixed the SM-2s, added the SM-3, and changed the file name to match the current standards).

Erik's current USN Parts sheet (that I pulled the Standard Missiles from) is found here.

_________________
๐Œ๐€๐“๐‡๐๐„๐“- ๐‘ป๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’•๐’‚๐’•๐’† ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘บ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 2:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
the radar is an new drawing of the APAR, not the S1850M. although I am not sure about the good dimensions either.... do you have some refs? (also for my 3d model of it)
on most other points I agree with you, mitch is apparently redrawing all modern Dutch combat ships instead of modifying. in case of the Rotterdam and JDW I understand that, but in this case......
I also agree that the THALES renders aren't good enough to base this on, even for the outlines there are mistakes in it.
It's a S1850M antenna only with texture added to the antenna face. I drew the thing myself, for the British Daring, I know what I'm talking about. And the S1850M antenna is larger and of a different shape than SMART-L.

The Rotterdam (as I did it) was never a really serious drawing. It was made for a game, not for shipbucket. It was later extensively reworked by others, but the base was never a serious effort. Ironically enough, the Rotterdam was based upon... A Thales render.

The funniest thing is that he apparently "reworked" the M-frigate... and promptly bolloxed up the hangar. In the original picture the Goalkeeper is on a slightly raised part of the hangar, and on his hangar, that raised part is missing. But that's wrong...
If you go around being all high and mighty about how accurate your reworkings are, you shouldn't fuck up things like that.

Timothy:
Thanks for the updates, but that SM-3 shouldn't be there. The ship might be able to fire it, but the Dutch navy doesn't have them in the inventory.

And yeah, great to be back. First thing I see is this...

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
MihoshiK wrote:
If you go around being all high and mighty about how accurate your reworkings are, you shouldn't fuck up things like that.

And yeah, great to be back. First thing I see is this...
well, you've missed a whole lot of other shit, like the mutiny and so on......
btw I agree with you, mitch depends too much on (mostly outdated or wrong) drawings of ships, I have pointed out a few problems on his Holland class drawing as well, which I found out when 3d modelling the ship.... but he doesn't wants to fix them now. I am jealous on his drawing skills, but he makes a lot of mistakes like that.

btw, welcome back MihoshiK ;)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 2:17 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
WHY ARE ALL OF YOU B**LSH****NG ME?
LAST TIME MY M FREGATE HAD COMMENT'S, WHY NOT 100% NEW?
AND NOW I DO THIS ONE 100% NEW I STILL GET BULLS**T

JUST WHAT THE F*** DO YOU GUYS WANT?

THE WHOLE F***ING DRAWING IS WRONG,EVERY SINGLE DIMENSION OF HANGAR, APAR, SUPERSTRUCTURE, EVERYTHING!
EVEN THE WHOLE UNDERWATER HULL

SO SHUT UP, BECAUSE THE ONLY THING YOU CAN MAKE THIS DRAWING GOOD, IS DOING IT 90% NEW!

Oh miho.
The Smart+l i used is the real size of the Smart+l, your smart l was to small so i used your ''pretending'' s1850m.
The s1850m, is not bigger.
Ill show you the pic.
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/2497/dsc1330.jpg
Good God, that image is way too big to include in the pageload. Linkified. - erik_t
And as of sm-3, we do have them.
The navy bought a whole set for one LCF.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Wรผrttemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 3:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Cristh sake...

1. If you feel that some shipbucket drawing is outdated by someway, you are free to drawn a new version of the ship. However I strongly suggest that if you decide to do so, you should consult the orginal artist and point out the stuff you feel is outdated. Then by general curtesy rules, the orginal artist should have the right to correct those mistakes if he wants to.

2. Don't let your personal pride go over reason. None of the shipbucket drawings are 100% accurate. New and better reference materials emerge time to time and sometimes it's evident that the orginal shipbucket drawing is outdated. That doesen't mean the orginal artist did it wrong. When someone points out there is stuff that should be done differently, don't take it personally. However like said, the orginal artist should have the right to make those adjustments.

3. Don't fix what aint broken. Shipbucket style has envolved trough out the times and thus some equipments and other stuff have been redrawn million times since the oldest shipbucket drawings were commissioned. However if there isen't anything but "outdated radars" eg. someone drawing the radar more accurately or fancier you don't need to change them. The orginal artist ofcourse can do it if he wants. Or he can give permission to someone to do it for him. I personally like to keep my own drawings updated when ever i learn new or change my style. But I preserve the right to do so for my own stuff.

4. Like said always consult the orginal artist when you are about to do something over their drawings. It prevents messes like these.

5. You are free to drawn your own version of some ship already done to the bucket. But make damn sure you do it better than the orginal one. If not, then you are just wasting bandwith. In these cases, consulting the orginal artist doesen't do you any harm and makes you a good boy.

Now apparently in this case, Mitchell is redrawing some ship done orginally by MihonshiK to the latters dislike. Well like I said, if you want to do this Mitch, you outta make them hell alot better than Miho did...and don't expect any headtapping from him.

Also this petty pickering about scale is useless. When you scale stuff by using percentages and pixels which covers 15cm you will get slightly different results anytime you do it. Shipbucket's accuracy on dimensions is superficial to the best. Of course if some ship is several meters too long or short, but for smaller differences, don't bother.

Gollevainen
God

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 3:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
I have been in the dock by the lcf evertsen.
And shoot a few pic's to draw this ship (thats why i do it now instead of the chosen S type i wanted to do earlier)
I got it now in my head.
And i asked vossiej to do this, he said ok.
And for the other ships mconrad said also ok.

But saying some false information while i got my facts right hurts me damm well.
And nothing stops me from finishing this right now!
Because im working on it, i got the whole ship in my head, i got tons of pics.
If i stop now, and being allowed later then it will be like its now.

And Just clear all the colour out of the original and trow it over mine.
You see it would be hard to do it.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Wรผrttemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 5:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
I'm a big enough man to admit when I'm wrong, and apparently I'm wrong about the SMART-L / S1850M antenna: The main difference seems to be in the internal electronics of the signal procesors. I falsely accused Mitch of using a wrong antenna, when in fact he was closer to being correct.

Even so, after looking around I figured that the SMART-L antenna could use an upgrade all the same (mainly thanks to this nice set of photos from the Danish Navy) and so I've pasted that onto the LCF:

[ img ]

Edit: Also, Mitchell when you had your "CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL" moment, you mentioned things like size of hangar, superstructure, etc. Lets make one thing clear. I lay no claims to the below the waterline part of the ship: That was Vossiej who added that. But for everything else, I used exactly the same Thales rendering which you are basing your drawing on. Zoink!

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 5:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
@mihoshik: you have edited the SMART-L, right.... is it OK if I use that one for the THALES and Dutch parts sheets which I am working on? or is it better using mitches version (or are they the same?)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 5:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Miho - I placed it on the Drawing because the Dutch are buying SM-3s.

The SM-3 has it's own problem. The one currently drawn is the SM-3 Block 2A, with the 21" (510mm) sustaniner motor. The currently tested Block 1, 1A, and 1B all use the old 13.5" sustainer motor (IIRC). The Big Book of Warfare is a great source for a lot of stuff.

Mitch - please don't inline images that big.

_________________
๐Œ๐€๐“๐‡๐๐„๐“- ๐‘ป๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’•๐’‚๐’•๐’† ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘บ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: Dutch Anti Air-commando-Frigate's(LCF)Posted: October 17th, 2010, 5:57 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
As for your drawing miho.
I quess its good to use that as the Smart-L, and the one i drew for S1850m (as easier recognition between the 2)
But your stabilisation foot is wrong.
[ img ]
This one is for the LCF's.

Anyway edit as of 20:45 GMT+1 10/17/2010.
Im off to study.
Attachment:
hr ms zeven provincien class (LCF)2.png
-I made a difference between the ''scout'' and the Kelvin Hughes.
Since the Kelvin is way larger then the scout on the LCF's.
Will change the one from rotterdam and M fregate aswell (Im clearing up the dutch file for golly anyway, its only better for the bucket if i fix it ^^)
-And yes the older smart l is still on it, didnt work on that part yet.

-Now i got an question.
I saw some time ago a very nice 5 bladed Screw on a drawing.
But i cant find it anymore, anybody knows where it is?
-And the ECM for LCF, anybody has it in 100%? and not behind railings ;)

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Wรผrttemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Last edited by Mitchell van Os on October 23rd, 2010, 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 13  [ 122 posts ]  Return to โ€œReal Designsโ€ | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 โ€ฆ 13 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]