Posts:1616 Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact:Website
Actually they are not even real proposals. As far as I understand these "projects" are just fantasies of artists who barely understand (if at all) naval shipbuilding. Kinda like those weird designs from old Popular Mechanics magazines.
Posts:4714 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact:Website
Own designs of someone more skilled Artists than us is still own designs. Neverwhere's suffices ships that were actually designed by a naval staff/engineering burey and presented for consideration to become something by naval staff or equalent.
So you can move them back to own desing.
Posts:4714 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact:Website
couse moddeling is art too ...
Naturally, if you can provide a actually listed company or desing burey to back these ships up, then they can stay in never-where sections, other wise, I instruct my mods to remove this back to own desings
Posts:3220 Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Much of what is being posted here is 'flights of fancy', and therefore this part of the forum is loosing its integrity: I'll leave it for others to police
Golly has this correct. Any ship posted here must be a real project that was never completed, or an unbuilt earlier version of a ship that was eventually built. It must have basis in fact and should be linked to some offical requirement or an offical shipbuilder/ design bureau. Naturally sometimes when plans have been lost or are incomplete then the artist has to fill in some of the blanks but the above should always apply and the artist should use reasonable guesswork based on the available sources they have.
If someone can provide proper proof these ships were real submissions then they can stay here. If they are speculative doodles by a bored designer then they should be in Own Designs.
_________________ Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Alex it's not just aimed at you. Everyone should be reminded of the proper use of these forums.
I think what we've got here is 50/50, it could be a real plausiable design or it could be something a designer doodled when he was waiting for his next teabreak. I say for now we leave it here.
_________________ Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Posts:3220 Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
ALVAMA wrote:
Good evening guys! I just do not need 3/4 guys with the same comment. One is enough, I am not stupid am I?
You're talking to moderators, please bear that in mind. If you'd given some background when you first posted then we would not have had to intervene, I suggest you think on that in future