Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 26 of 51  [ 510 posts ]  Go to page « 124 25 26 27 2851 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 12:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Despite the fact that I have Lynxes and AW101s flying overhead on a daily basis it always surprises me just how big helicopters are compared to cars. And it's not as if Land Rovers are particularly small as cars goes.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 12:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Nice ship! But why they have a structure on the rear of the flight deck?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
CanisD
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 1:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 307
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:47 am
Location: South Carolina
Contact: Website
She wasn't used as a carrier anymore, rather she was a maintenance ship, so having extra workshops was more important than having a clear deck.

_________________
"If you want to have dinner with the Devil, make sure to bring a long spoon!"
The New Wolf's Shipyard
The New Wolf's Shipyard Forum


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 1:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
That means Ocean is no longer a carrier, but more like a LPH?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 2:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Nice ones Cyril :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 5:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
CanisD wrote:
She wasn't used as a carrier anymore, rather she was a maintenance ship, so having extra workshops was more important than having a clear deck.

Not quite Canis,that was Persius,Pioneer and later Triumph.At the time of Suez Ocean and Thesus were made into makeshift commando carriers.between them they landed 45 commando RM.

[ img ]

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: February 15th, 2012, 8:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Beautiful work on HMS Ocean, but there is some discrepancy between the top view and both side views. on the top view there are some lifeboats near the port-side edge which are not present in the side-views.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: March 3rd, 2012, 11:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
deankal55
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: March 3rd, 2012, 11:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 101
Joined: December 11th, 2011, 9:11 pm
Bombhead, another flag issue. Canada didn't adopt the mapleleaf flag until 1964 and started using it in 1965. I think you should be using the Canadian red ensign.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: British carriers 50-85.Posted: March 3rd, 2012, 11:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
deankal55 have you got a pic ?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 26 of 51  [ 510 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 124 25 26 27 2851 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]