» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Locked] [*]  Page 7 of 8  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 »
[Print view]
Author Message
KES Paige captain
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 4:45 am
Offline
Posts: 106
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 5:29 am
Location: California, baby!!!
KES Paige captain wrote:
It will run steam pressure, will have three turrets ( two on bow and one on stern) and a lot of modern Rocket launchers, four prop pods, two rudders, four denny brown stablizers, and a clean, futuristic superstructure.
Please read this, Colosseum.
is it reasonable?
Top
[Profile]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:02 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Why a steam plant?

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile]
KES Paige captain
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:16 am
Offline
Posts: 106
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 5:29 am
Location: California, baby!!!
because...
1. it is strong
2. it is not radioactive
3. the ship is sitting in water, so theres no fuel problem (except the gas)
4. the only exhaust is the steam, which is blasted into the water, underwater, and instantly turns back into water
5. it does not have any smoke that can be spotted over the horizon
6. IT'S STEAMPUNK!!!
Top
[Profile]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:22 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
KES Paige captain wrote:
because...
1. it is strong
2. it is not radioactive
3. the ship is sitting in water, so theres no fuel problem (except the gas)
4. the only exhaust is the steam, which is blasted into the water, underwater, and instantly turns back into water
5. it does not have any smoke that can be spotted over the horizon
6. IT'S STEAMPUNK!!!
Umms you need fuel for the heat required in a steamplant, hence either Oil/coal=smoke

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)
There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards
Top
[Profile]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
That's just so wrong. I'm going to let PotatOS say it for me. Please read up on the Rankine Cycle before you post any more.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:44 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Ehhh...it is still awfully horrid. No improvements sofar! Please heed mine and, now Tim's advice and do not post till you get everything straight!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Top
[Profile]
KES Paige captain
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:51 am
Offline
Posts: 106
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 5:29 am
Location: California, baby!!!
Rodondo wrote:
KES Paige captain wrote:
because...
1. it is strong
2. it is not radioactive
3. the ship is sitting in water, so theres no fuel problem (except the gas)
4. the only exhaust is the steam, which is blasted into the water, underwater, and instantly turns back into water
5. it does not have any smoke that can be spotted over the horizon
6. IT'S STEAMPUNK!!!
Umms you need fuel for the heat required in a steamplant, hence either Oil/coal=smoke
umms its run on a fuel similar to propane, so yes, it does need to carry fuel.
Top
[Profile]
KES Paige captain
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 5:52 am
Offline
Posts: 106
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 5:29 am
Location: California, baby!!!
Does any of you have a drawing of a russian gattling gun turret?
Top
[Profile]
KES Paige captain
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on RADAR.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 6:10 am
Offline
Posts: 106
Joined: January 30th, 2012, 5:29 am
Location: California, baby!!!
Hope you like it!!!
I LOVE GATTLING GUNS!!! there are three on it to deal with pirates. What SAMs should i use? NEED HELP ON RADAR AND RADAR TOWER!!!
Top
[Profile]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: futuristic battleship; HELP on superstructure.Posted: February 14th, 2012, 6:13 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
KES Paige captain wrote:
umms its run on a fuel similar to propane, so yes, it does need to carry fuel.
Propane is highly unlikely. Kerosene or something heavier is much more likely due to storage concerns.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Locked]  Page 7 of 8  [ 75 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 … 4 5 6 7 8 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]