Posts:446 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Not entirely sold on the main gun turrets, the lack of lines showing the edges of the panels just doesn't look SB.
_________________ 95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious. Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series
I have to disagree on this one. Golly's rendition is both smart and attractive.
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I agree with DLR
Right now the shading on the main guns suggests that the A gun is round rather than angular and that the X and Y guns are concave!
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Uhhh...it doesn't... Looks perfectly alright to me...
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
I was under the impression that hard angles of less than 90 degrees were to be drawn in a dark gray.
But if you guys really want to get picky about shading, I guess that works too... but don't make me bust out Photoshop's gradients tool and really put you all to shame.