Shipbucket

Can we please get back to the ship before we get to off topic.

I don't know why you guys even bother...

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)

This^

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)
There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards

To be honest, after a month of us trying to be nice and offering help, and another month of us making cracks while some members still try to help, the only reason that it is any better is that other people have drawn parts of it. You need to start making progress or I'm going to start locking threads. Real progress. Progress that I can see.

Do you understand?

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

I can't see much progress. Like the yacht thread its becoming a case of taking everyone elses work and sticking it together. Yes its kitbasking but on a gross scale and there seems to be no logic in the whole thing.
The rise in fustration and sarcastic comments is rising in all these threads. If no-one has anything constructive to say then don't say it. I'd lock this thread now but I'll accept Tim's patience and I'll wait to see if anything better comes together.

One piece of advice APDAF, don't bother about the AU or the name or why everyone has to say it. It has nothing to with the design of the warship. Focus on the design of the ship, focus on the purpose of the ship. Forget the name, forget all the wacky AU ideas and just focus on making the ships. Fill in the AU blanks later.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

Now what needs doing on the ship?

O.T. You need to sort out you post Hood.

But not ever a ships name. I can just imagine the problems with signalling Also, I don't know about other navies, but the RN, and particularly the RAN, has a tradition (on the lower deck) of altering ships names into something funnier. Now back to the saga

APDAF you've aksed that question for nine pages!!
You seem to want others to do the legwork for you. Right see the attached and take that as a FIRST step. Do what needs to be done from the attached picture. Then go look at ten other battleships on this forum and compare yours. Look at what is lacking from yours and then make some other changes on your own and then we'll see what progress has been made.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

and all this also still counts, IMO

I have posted this before, in the FIRST comment of this thread. it explains many of the suggestions hood does above this..... so don't say you didn't knew!

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Hood, the aft mast doesn't neccessarily have to be a tripod. The QE class had an arrangement like that, tripod forward and pole aft.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor