Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 5  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 »
Author Message
Colosseum
Post subject: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 2:32 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Long time coming, I'm surprised it's taken us this long to get General Belgrano drawn for Shipbucket. This was a surprisingly difficult drawing, since I've become an insane perfectionist and there was fairly little info on the radar fit, gun layout, etc. The thing that caused the most trouble was the bridge and forward superstructure... I couldn't find any decent photos taken from the side, so had to work from a few scale model photos and whatnot. I hope the result is satisfying.

[ img ]

This is Belgrano as lost in 1982.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Last edited by Colosseum on February 3rd, 2012, 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SrGopher
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 2:55 am
Offline
Posts: 371
Joined: April 13th, 2011, 9:21 pm
Thats a pretty good drawing for eyeballing parts of it. Great work!

_________________
Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 2:57 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Well I wouldn't say 'eyeballing' as I had some plans to work from, but all of them were frustratingly wrong in different places. This is why I'm always skeptical of ship plans unless it's from Friedman's or similar. It was the details that I had to do a lot of legwork to figure out!

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 4:21 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
I had no idea that Belgrano had Seacat. Interesting to know.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 4:58 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Nice. I thought General Belgrano is a gun cruiser until it sank.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 5:29 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Yep, SeaCat was fitted in 1967.

When it was sunk, the British thought it had been further upgraded with Exocet missiles.

I plan to draw the Belgrano's sister ship ARA Nueve de Julio (ex USS Boise) later, but for now I'm taking a break from the Brooklyns to focus on other ships.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 5:38 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Ahh Exocet... It'll sink anyways with or without Exocet.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 5:54 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I'm kind of curious why everyone likes to poke fun at the Belgrano...

From what I've read the Argentinians were more than competent. The ship got sunk by a British nuclear submarine designed 30 years after Belgrano was laid down. I think in fairness these ships did pretty well.

It's also a bit disrespectful towards the men who gave their lives while doing their duty aboard Belgrano.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cplnew83
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 7:48 am
Offline
Posts: 419
Joined: January 9th, 2012, 9:50 am
Colosseum wrote:
It's also a bit disrespectful towards the men who gave their lives while doing their duty aboard Belgrano.
Agree with you, but what do you expect from someone (Clonecommander6454 :roll: ) which lives in a childish Alternate Universe ?

BTW : Smart work on the Brooklyn class, thank you.

_________________
Je pardonne à tous ceux qui m'ont offensé... mais je garde la liste!


Worklist, FD scale submarines and ships :
- Project 971 "Akula" (80%)
- Project 705 "Alpha" (10%)
- Project 371 (70%)
- Project 1459 (30%)
- Projekt 151 Sassnitz (To be redone)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ultimo Tiger
Post subject: Re: ARA General BelgranoPosted: February 3rd, 2012, 8:12 am
Offline
Posts: 20
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:22 pm
Rather apt timing if I say so myself.

According to one article I read, they put on fake Exocet launchers to make the ship look like it was armed with it:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2000/oc ... .falklands
Quote:
I asked Barcena if his ship had carried Exocet missiles, and he confirmed that it had, but when I asked Coco the same question, whether the Belgrano had carried Exocets, he laughed and told me that the Belgrano's carpenters had fabricated Exocet launchers out of wood, to make it look as if the cruiser carried the missiles. He added that the Belgrano was not even fitted with sonar.
Although HMS Conqueror was designed long after the Belgrano was, the ship itself was sunk with torpedoes dating from the 1920s (instead of the more modern Tigerfish ones). A vindication of tried and tested technology above something new?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 5  [ 47 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]