» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 8 of 17  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 17 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Hawkeye
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 28th, 2012, 8:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 156
Joined: January 8th, 2012, 8:59 am
Location: Germany (Hannover)
Contact: Yahoo Messenger
Thanks to CanisD for the pics of the Forrestal-Class.
Am working on all the retractable masts and hinged devices
Here's a good help:

http://www.hnsa.org/doc/ecat/index.htm#toc

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 12:22 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
someone knows his airwing?

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 12:45 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
For the US or the Forrestal? US was intended to get "12-18 heavy bombers and 54 jet fighters" according to the Osprey book on the Nimitz class.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 3:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Well the heavy bomber was the A7 Savage, the primary reason why she was designed.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 9:31 am
bezobrazov wrote:
Well the heavy bomber was the A7 Savage, the primary reason why she was designed.
Indeed, some great planes. Heavy, two turboprops, and place for nukes, Hhahahah. :lol:
Top
[Quote]
Hawkeye
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 4:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 156
Joined: January 8th, 2012, 8:59 am
Location: Germany (Hannover)
Contact: Yahoo Messenger
Update info

Retractable masts:

AN/SPS-8A - done
TACAN + ESM/ECM pods - done
CCA equipment AN/SPS-6 and AN/SPS 8 - done
Meteorological antenna and mast - in progess

Hinged device:

Direction finder - done

others:

AN/SPS-10 radomes - done

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 6:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
ALVAMA wrote:
bezobrazov wrote:
Well the heavy bomber was the A7 Savage, the primary reason why she was designed.
Indeed, some great planes. Heavy, two turboprops, and place for nukes, Hhahahah. :lol:
Just a nitpick: the Savage wasn't a turboprop, it just had regular piston engines - although it did have a jet engine in the fuselage! I believe it was for extra speed both on take-off and to squeeze a few more knots for a quick getaway.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 6:29 pm
klagldsf wrote:
ALVAMA wrote:
bezobrazov wrote:
Well the heavy bomber was the A7 Savage, the primary reason why she was designed.
Indeed, some great planes. Heavy, two turboprops, and place for nukes, Hhahahah. :lol:
Just a nitpick: the Savage wasn't a turboprop, it just had regular piston engines - although it did have a jet engine in the fuselage! I believe it was for extra speed both on take-off and to squeeze a few more knots for a quick getaway.
Oh Okay, Then my book is wrong I was reading Haha.
Top
[Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 29th, 2012, 7:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
ALVAMA wrote:

Oh Okay, Then my book is wrong I was reading Haha.
I'd be willing to guess it was a translation error on the author's part. The A2J Super Savage would've had turboprops as its sole power but it was never developed operationally, the Navy instead going for the pure-jet A3D Skywarrior.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hawkeye
Post subject: Re: CV 58 - United StatesPosted: January 30th, 2012, 12:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 156
Joined: January 8th, 2012, 8:59 am
Location: Germany (Hannover)
Contact: Yahoo Messenger
Here's the new update.
You can see the retractable masts in their laid down position on the end of the drawing.
God, my english.
I have done my best. Hope it is ok.
-Michael-

[ img ]

_________________
My worklist:
http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=2767
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 8 of 17  [ 162 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 17 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]