Shipbucket

They are 4-in and always shown as drawn; if in doubt please check other drawings. My only advice at this point is to tweak the upper bridge wings, as they step down very low, so as to create a risk of crew falling over

Thanks PB, your right... I don't think that bridge wing would have passed health and saftey! I've made it bit more sturdy and added a few more details.

I think she's come out very nicely.Good looking cruiser.

Thanks a lot Bombhead, it was half finished for a long time. I'm quite pleased with the results, thanks to the help from the forum.

Well, I like the result; one of the better 'own designs' current. Of course, I'd do it differently, but that's just personal preference; so all in all a very good drawing

I think he's talking about the gun on the elevated platform, not the elevation of the gunbarrels

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

That's precisely what I meant... thanks Thiel.
The layout is awkward... and I know that all guns which are physically able to reach 0* are to be shown that way, or in the lowest possible elevation otherwise. That's just Standards.

That is a nice looking cruiser

_________________

Ah! Enlightenment - re guns elevation.

I've put all the 4.5" guns on the same deck as Carthaginian suggested, it did look a bit weird before.