Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: iranian kortenaerPosted: December 18th, 2011, 11:59 am
klagldsf wrote:
ALVAMA wrote:
This design was later re-used by the Dutch what would lead to the Jacob van Heemskerck class.
Yet that design had the Mk 13 moved aft (it also lacked a medium-caliber naval gun, once again the consequence of weight limits)
Offcource I know that, I am not that stupid, but what I say is true.... I have read files.


Top
[Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: iranian kortenaerPosted: December 18th, 2011, 12:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
was the design supposed to be indentical in the hull size to the standard kortainer?... What worries me most is that the source seems to indicate that the front side of the structure angles sligthly over 90 degree... and the angle shown in the source over the varius supporting rigs of the mast are different what you've drawn.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: iranian kortenaerPosted: December 18th, 2011, 12:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
most likely it is the same lenght, although it might be slightly different as I have no evidence on that. I cannot see what you mean with the angles of the supporting rigs..... the angle of the structure... you mean in front of the mk 22? gonna take a look at that, that might be possible, although I can't see why.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: iranian kortenaerPosted: December 18th, 2011, 2:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
I think Ace has the hull and superstructure correct - or as correct as any of us can get it without further sources (which we don't have).

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: iranian kortenaerPosted: December 18th, 2011, 7:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
ALVAMA wrote:
klagldsf wrote:
ALVAMA wrote:
This design was later re-used by the Dutch what would lead to the Jacob van Heemskerck class.
Yet that design had the Mk 13 moved aft (it also lacked a medium-caliber naval gun, once again the consequence of weight limits)
Offcource I know that, I am not that stupid, but what I say is true.... I have read files.
I wasn't calling you stupid :p


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: iranian kortenaerPosted: December 19th, 2011, 1:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Very weird design based on an S-class.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]