Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 4  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4
Author Message
erik_t
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 16th, 2011, 7:44 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
But there's little need to bring the actual computer installation with you. What's needed is to move the radars further out, not the computers. Outrageous HF NTDS of doom, installed on a bunch of radar pickets, is the proper solution to extending range.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 16th, 2011, 11:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
I'll admit I'm not even sure what SAGE is. I thought it was the radar installation itself.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
deankal55
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 17th, 2011, 2:01 am
Offline
Posts: 101
Joined: December 11th, 2011, 9:11 pm
klagldsf wrote:
I'll admit I'm not even sure what SAGE is. I thought it was the radar installation itself.
SAGE stands for Semi-Automatic Ground Environment-the term meant something to some engineers. It doesn't make much sense to me. It was a system for ground-controlled interceptions that connected a very big, vacuum tube controlled computer to the autopilots in intercepter fighters or in this case the guided missile. The USAF installed these big comupters in very large blast resistent buildings-see photo above. The system relied on inputs from the radar posts on the DEW line and other locations.

Hope this helps.


Last edited by deankal55 on December 17th, 2011, 2:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
deankal55
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 17th, 2011, 2:11 am
Offline
Posts: 101
Joined: December 11th, 2011, 9:11 pm
erik_t wrote:
This is me shaking my head in frustration and sadness.
Don't feel too bad. It was an interesting idea that generated four pages of discussion. While I still think carrier-based fighters and Talos could the job you want to modify the Alaskas to do you might try mounting the Sea BOMARC on another ship. I don't think putting it on an Essex would help much, the standard displacement of the Essex class and the Alaska class are about the same. Maybe a battleship ala the Mississippi.

Maybe you should try a "distributed" system. As noted above the DER radar pickets would be important. Think about putting the SAGE gear on another ship. The SAGE control ship could then control all three modified Alaskas at the same time as well as fighters.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 17th, 2011, 2:20 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Oh, I'm amused by the design. I'm more annoyed with the defense of it.

Regardless, where I think Essex would help is enclosed volume being designed into the ship from the start.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
deankal55
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 17th, 2011, 2:31 am
Offline
Posts: 101
Joined: December 11th, 2011, 9:11 pm
You wouldn't have to build any hanger space. The Essex hanger space would do just fine, as would the elevators. Move the SAGE stuff to a modified oiler or sea plane tender and you're ready to go.


Last edited by deankal55 on December 17th, 2011, 3:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 17th, 2011, 3:08 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
That's what I mean. A carrier hull is peculiarly amenable to conversion to an early SAM ship.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
deankal55
Post subject: Re: BCG-1 "Alaska"-class extra-long-range air-defense cruisePosted: December 17th, 2011, 3:34 am
Offline
Posts: 101
Joined: December 11th, 2011, 9:11 pm
Remember the Essexes were built with wooden flight decks. Be sure to flame-proof the deck under the launcher, or deflect the engine exhaust away from the deck. And remember it should be a "RIM-10 Sea BOMARC".


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 4  [ 38 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]