Shipbucket

Japanese project CVS / LPA

gathering an existing drawing which he is challenging to observe compliance with the original author that compares the ship DDH-181 and DDH-183.

credits?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

very interesting design....

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.

I believe that the ship is being built, although the use of the Lockheed Martin F-35B is highly speculative. Two ships of the class are planned, DDH-183 and DDH-184. The class is also known as 22DDH. I presume that the ship will also be named for an ancient province of Japan if JS Hyūga (DDH-181) and JS Ise (DDH-182) are any indication. Settsu? Kiwachi?

Additional Information:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... /22ddh.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19000t_class_destroyer

Oh, I see now. The ship is in a CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take Off Barrier Arrested Recovery) configuration. So the aircraft would be Lockheed Martin F-35C Lightning II.

I am not ignoring Bill and I hate the narcissism

Also sources should be provided.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

What narcissism?

I can only assume he means that he hates the insistence on crediting... for some reason...

Dude, you draw a ship like you write a history text. If you use an idea/piece of someone else's work, you credit them. In a text, this comes as a reference to that work. In this, it comes by including their name in the header. It's not narcissism, it's good manners.

There is no option here; please ammend the drawings to show the original artist's name, followed by yours. If you don't the topic will be deleted