Posts:1616 Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact:Website
Weisman wrote:
Another SMS Blucher
Although being a pretty cool drawing overall, it's not up to SB standard and the ship appears to be about 15 feet longer than needed. Besides, I've already drawn her...
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Lazer_one wrote:
Weisman wrote:
Lazer_one wrote:
Shading is not SB compliant...
Maybe you're right...
definetely yes.
Very much so.
Anti aliased hull shading, non-standard gun barrels and shaded port-holes just to start with
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
And if it it isn't there you check out the Worklist Registry to see if anyone is working on it.
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Quick links
FAQ
Register
Login![[Post Reply]](./styles/legacy/theme/en/button_topic_reply.gif "Post a reply"){kind=small}
![[*]](./styles/legacy/theme/images/button_topic_tools.gif){kind=small}
BTW may I cut out your excellent badge and attach it in the "CoA for navy vessels" thread 
![[Profile]](./styles/legacy/theme/en/icon_user_profile.gif "Profile: Weisman"){kind=icon}
![[Quote]](./styles/legacy/theme/en/icon_post_quote.gif "Reply with quote"){kind=icon}
![[ img ]](https://lazerone.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/firma-seneca.png)
![[ img ]](http://www.shipbucket.com/Real%20Designs/Germany/ACRBlucher.png)
