Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
Paul Carl
Post subject: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 2:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 207
Joined: February 21st, 2011, 3:15 am
Can someone point me to the Shipbucket topic that had the Hull Classifications?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 6:31 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I don't think there is one.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 7:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Hull classifications is a modified of USN style, where BB is battleship, CV is a carrier and SS for submarines and so on.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 7:45 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
Hull classification symbols for merchant ships were briefly discussed in this thread:
http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1239

Also there's a Wiki article with a huge list of various hull symbols which I find quite useful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hu ... ifications

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Lazer_one
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 8:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1453
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:58 am
Location: Milan - Italy
Contact: Website
WhyMe wrote:
Also there's a Wiki article with a huge list of various hull symbols which I find quite useful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hu ... ifications
this hull classification refers to US Navy and it is actually used also by "western" countries (let's say NATO).
Actually within SB we are using this classification for all the world (more or less).
The "W" prefix refers theorertically to US Coast Guard but has been extended to "Generic" Coast Guard.

_________________
Lazer_One
[ img ]

Lazer_One's Worlist - Updated 2021

Documentation is always welcome here

Lazer_One's Blog


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 8:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Not really. NATO has its own system with a number of national additions, the RN has another and I'm certain the old east block countries has their own as well. As far as I'm aware the only ones who use the US system is the USN and Australia, and they use their own version of it.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 16th, 2011, 10:54 pm
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
I know using the US System is the generally accepted norm, but is that codified within the rules?

And Paul, were you looking for just a list of Hull Classifications?

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 17th, 2011, 12:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Shipbucket used to use a modified USN classification:

[ img ]

Now we use pennant numbers and letters for file naming.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Hull ClassificationPosted: November 17th, 2011, 9:58 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Of russian ships Ive tried to establish a practice to use Their own designations, and when the designation is not known, or the ships dates from imperial days, used the common practice found on Jane's and Conways Books.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 9 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]