Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
what do you consider functional? because this ship will not be fast, will need an very large crew, will be impractical, an bitch to moor or sail...... while this ship would work, I don't think you could call it 'work well'
also, an important thing to keep in mind is 'if it looks good, it sails good'. this counts especially for the hull: graceful lines give the best characteristics.
right now, it looks like one of the depotship conversions.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:3220 Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
I'm asking a serious question here; APDAF, are you serious? Meaning, either a) this has all been a good joke at the expense of some of more sincere and helpful members - in effect wasting folks time; or, b) are you quite simply not able to engage constructively with the feedback (excluding the more exasperated ones), aimed at improving your skills; and I'm not including your drawings to date as they seem fundamentally flawed to begin with.
If a) then please feel free to pull the joke; and if b) please take some time out (as I've advised previously) and learn some basic skills before posting again. And my advice to other members is to leave him to it