Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 43 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Go to page « 141 42 43 44 4590 »
Author Message
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 12:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
43 tons? My source seems to be bad. I'll redo her with ligther arms.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 12:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
The basic problem is that the class was not suitable for anti-air conversion; and what the RN desperately needed (in early WWII) was asw assets; so a few light aa, plus a gun for use against submarines was all that was required, and all that could have been done [realistically]. I have done HMS Roxborough, a modified 'Town', based on Colosseums USN version, but it does not seem to be on the archive; when I'm home I'll post it for comparison.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 12:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
That reminds me, isn't it about time for another "lost sheep" thread like the one you did on the old forum?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
HMS Sophia
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 12:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 863
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 10:34 am
lost sheep?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 12:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
PB made a thread were people could post WIPs that had been abandoned and finished drawings by other users that for some reason hadn't been uploaded.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
HMS Sophia
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 1:03 pm
Offline
Posts: 863
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 10:34 am
Curious. And what, its free reign on them? Or just bask in the glory of unfinished drawings :P


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 1:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The goal would be to get them finished and uploaded, but the rules would be up to the mods.
Anyway, we're getting of topic.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 1:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Thiel wrote:
That reminds me, isn't it about time for another "lost sheep" thread like the one you did on the old forum?
Yes, good idea. And yes, OT.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 2:06 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Fitting multiple directors will also be impossible; indeed even a single Mk 37 is probably impossible. The below-decks weight, volume and power requirements were considerable. Perhaps a single Mk 56.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: November 8th, 2011, 6:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
HMS Roxborough; for some reason I never submiited it for upload; but it does show what the problem was in RN service, that is, the bridge. To be fair, these old ships were designed with the intention of fleet support against opposing destroyers in 'no mans land' between the battlefleets. They weren't supposed to do continuous steaming, or escorting slow convoys, more, short sprints with refueling from bigger ships. They didn't do too bad in the pacific, but in the North Atlantic they suffered. On some occasions the bridge was crushed, so any upgrading was in that area, as in this one:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 43 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 141 42 43 44 4590 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]