Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: October 26th, 2011, 11:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Thiel wrote:
Didn't they fire converted HAFRs?
Uh, you know it doesn't say. There is every implication that it is infact the Mk 105s you have here.
erik_t wrote:
I suspect it might be the unpowered single Army mount, but it could be the L70.
The A. D. Baker drawing shows it to be a twin (I have the drawing infront of me). I think that in the resize of the source several close lines greyed out and make it hard to visualize.

That said, I think they 40mm Bofors does match up well:

[ img ]

_________________
๐Œ๐€๐“๐‡๐๐„๐“- ๐‘ป๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’•๐’‚๐’•๐’† ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘บ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: October 26th, 2011, 11:33 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Looks good thus far, Thiel, keep up the good work!

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: October 30th, 2011, 5:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
[ img ]
Almost there. The SPS-10 is a bit of a guess but it matches the drawing fairly well.

_________________
โ€œCloseโ€ only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: October 30th, 2011, 7:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Per St. Norman, "Deliveries began in October 1953, and it was considered so effective in ASW operations that SPS-10 was to equip 25 per cent of all ASW vessels by the end of 1956."

She commissioned before SPS-10 was available, and certainly would have been very low-priority for the upgrade. Given that she went out of commission in 1969 (and spent 1960-1965 in reserve), I would be somewhat surprised if she ever received SPS-10. Much more likely to me would be SG-6, SPS-4 or SPS-5.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: November 1st, 2011, 7:30 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
[ img ]
This time with boats.

_________________
โ€œCloseโ€ only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: November 1st, 2011, 2:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
The rockects atop the drawing are bit pretentious and not fitting to the purpose. Otherwise great drawing :)

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USS CarronadePosted: November 1st, 2011, 3:38 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
I think five is maybe a bit much, but I'd keep one of them IMHO.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Return to โ€œReal Designsโ€ | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]