Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Scifibug
Post subject: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 3:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 250
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 6:35 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida
A Radical Reconstruction of the SPRUANCE Class DD as proposed by Lt. John Roach USNR in his article "Warships Should Look Warlike" page 66-76 USNIP June 1979.
[ img ]

This is the second design I've Shipbucketted from this article. The first was a reconstruction of the FFG-7 profile.

Damn! Its been a long time since I've been able to get a ship out. I need to take more vacation time.
There was design Lt. drew with more modest changes to the Spru-can, but I never liked the velveta box and oil derrick like Perry and, to a lesser extent, the Spruance classes.
Maybe the Spruance's would of lasted longer if they looked more like a warship?
The author did like the astetics of the Kara class Russian cruiser and the British Country class and I think the Burkes went a long way in improving the looks of US warships I jut wish we did a follow-on to the Perry's instead of the LCS.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 3:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
that is.... awesome! only one thing: wouldn't the spruances have lost their modular capabilities by an design like this?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 5:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Thank god for The Bug :) This is a trully imteresting design concept; I'm not sure if I grok all the details but it looks impressive.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 5:25 pm
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
If they had been built like that, I wonder if other ships in the USN might have continued to look like ships rather than things built out of Lego blocks and tinker toys?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 6:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Good quality drawing, but I'd still prefer the guns split fore and aft. I do admit that by putting them on one end does allow for a larger shared magazine.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 6:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I am wondering, now I am looking better... would the magazine for the asroc fit over there?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Scifibug
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 8:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 250
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 6:35 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida
Quote:
wouldn't the spruances have lost their modular capabilities by an design like this?
Unknown, depends on how good the naval architect was.
Quote:
I wonder if other ships in the USN might have continued to look like ships rather than things built out of Lego blocks and tinker toys?
I would of hoped so.
Quote:
I'd still prefer the guns split fore and aft.
Lt. Roach also proposed a less radical Spru-can design. But since this post was to start a discussion on aesthetics I choose to do the more radical design.
Quote:
would the magazine for the asroc fit over there?
I believe the magazine would be behind the launcher, not under it.

Thanks for all your comments. :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 9:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
This one realy looks the job, a warship. Excellent draw Scifibug.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 10:24 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Certainly prettier than the real thing, although aesthetics is not what I'd seek to maximize on a warship and the real thing was undoubtedly more effective...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: SPRUANCE Class Radical ReconstructionPosted: October 12th, 2011, 10:40 pm
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
And so were it's descendants, Erik. If this design had been built instead of the one that really was, what would Ticonderoga have looked like? I'm assuming Kidd might never have been built.

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 17 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]