Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 6  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
Author Message
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 11th, 2011, 7:37 am
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
It looks like PVLS forward and Mk 41 aft...a 128 cell mk 41 using the Seahawk as a reference.

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ONI-Defense
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 11th, 2011, 4:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 404
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 11:13 pm
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Thiel wrote:
Are those pads fore and aft VLS blocks?
Those on the aft are indeed VLS blocks, there are also some in the same configuration as those of the Zumwalt to the fore section of the ship, but I believe you mean the panel on the bow which I removed in an update. I was using a earlier renditions of the Zumwalt class as reference material some of which had a panel on the bow which I now have left out in the new update.

_________________
Current Worklist: http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=5562


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ONI-Defense
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 11th, 2011, 4:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 404
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 11:13 pm
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Navybrat85 wrote:
It looks like PVLS forward and Mk 41 aft...a 128 cell mk 41 using the Seahawk as a reference.
Mk 57 actually, but I see what you mean compared in scale to the Seahawk, I'll do some size adjustment work tonight. Thanks for pointing it out I probably wouldn't have noticed that.

_________________
Current Worklist: http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=5562


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 11th, 2011, 5:42 pm
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
No Problem. It looked like a 64 cell Mk. 41 or Sylver, which are about half the length of a Seahawk, give or take a few pixels. The aft VLS pad is roughly the same size, which indicated a much larger system.

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Raxar
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 11th, 2011, 10:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1407
Joined: August 31st, 2011, 4:49 pm
Location: Michigan
I think your aft gun is backwards.

_________________
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 11th, 2011, 10:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Raxar wrote:
I think your aft gun is backwards.
it should be mounted like that. if you look at Zumwalt drawings ....


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ONI-Defense
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 19th, 2011, 11:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 404
Joined: May 10th, 2011, 11:13 pm
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Pelican Class Heavy LCAC
Attachment:
uealcac.PNG

_________________
Current Worklist: http://www.shipbucket.com/forums/viewto ... f=5&t=5562


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 20th, 2011, 6:27 am
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
Nice LCAC...Only minor critique...maybe one pixel wide shading at the top of the lower bulge on the skirt?

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SrGopher
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 20th, 2011, 6:38 pm
Offline
Posts: 371
Joined: April 13th, 2011, 9:21 pm
It looks pretty top heavy for something supposed to float on a cushion of air.

_________________
Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: UEA VesselsPosted: October 20th, 2011, 7:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
SrGopher wrote:
It looks pretty top heavy for something supposed to float on a cushion of air.
It doesn't really make any difference to a hovercraft.When hit by a cross wind they just move sideways.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 6  [ 56 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]