True, and while I agree that the letter of the standards was not broken, the spirit of them was if not violated, very nearly violated.
Sorry Tim I can't agree with that.When you get a really good reference drawing it's every artists wet dream.You slavishly copy/trace it to the best of your ability and finish it off to the SB standards in your own style.
I really wouldn't know. I'm not anywhere near as prolific as the rest of you, and what I have drawn, as been done with very limited sources.
What we have is a continuum ranging from
- Doing a very nearly 1-1 copy off of source material for not just lines but color (what we see here)
- Tracing off of an A.D. Baker III quality drawing with a lot of pictures for detail
- Working off of a low-quality outline with a lot of pictures
- Working off of a handful of pictures and low quality drawings (this is where CGBL falls)
- A painting/outline of something very very similar and some written specifications (this is where DG/AEGIS and the Mission Essential Unit [MEU] fall)
Very clearly standing policy has been that the second category does not require a citation, and the question that arises is if the first category does. It's going to be a very fine line.