Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Timothy Derails Niteroi thread with carrier tangentPosted: September 25th, 2011, 9:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Biancini1995 wrote:
The problem here is because of the governament with is not interessed in give funds to the navy.
You guys have an Aircraft Carrier. In that one ship you've got better power projection ability than anyone but the US, Russia, and France. You're on par with Italy and Spain because while you only have one carrier and they have two each, SΓ£o Paulo is a CATOBAR carrier, as opposed to the STOVL carriers the Europeans in question operate.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Biancini1995
Post subject: Re: Type 21 On Steroids: Brazil's Niteroi-Class FFGsPosted: September 25th, 2011, 10:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 744
Joined: August 19th, 2011, 7:54 pm
The problem Brazil doesn't build any medium or Larger ships in the navy and don't any interrest.

_________________
Verusea Alternative Universe is starting to build up.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Type 21 On Steroids: Brazil's Niteroi-Class FFGsPosted: September 26th, 2011, 1:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
TimothyC wrote:
Biancini1995 wrote:
The problem here is because of the governament with is not interessed in give funds to the navy.
You guys have an Aircraft Carrier. In that one ship you've got better power projection ability than anyone but the US, Russia, and France. You're on par with Italy and Spain because while you only have one carrier and they have two each, SΓ£o Paulo is a CATOBAR carrier, as opposed to the STOVL carriers the Europeans in question operate.
But the Sao Paulo won't be in for commission long will she? IIRC she's rather old

Also I suppose we Aussies will be in the same group as the Europeans soon?

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Type 21 On Steroids: Brazil's Niteroi-Class FFGsPosted: September 26th, 2011, 3:03 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Rodondo wrote:
But the Sao Paulo won't be in for commission long will she? IIRC she's rather old
The Brazilians just spent five years rebuilding her (everything from her Steam plant to her CCTV system). This is the same navy that operated Minas Gerais for just shy of 41 years, and had her still in commission on her 56th anniversary of her first commissioning. I'd expect another 10-15 years of service out of her minimum.
Rodondo wrote:
Also I suppose we Aussies will be in the same group as the Europeans soon?
A friend of mine came up with a Catagory listing of nations with aircraft carriers, or carrier capability, and while simplistic it does show off the different levels that exist
  1. CATOBAR Navies
    1. USA
    2. France (while they only have one carrier, and it's a rather flawed design, it's still a CVN)
    3. Russia
    4. Brazil
    5. China (with Varyag having now been stood up)
  2. STOVL Navies (Those navies that have STOVL carriers, and operate them as such)
    1. Spain
    2. Italy
    3. India
    4. Thailand (while they have a carrier, the status of the Harriers is uncertain)
  3. STOVL Capable Navies (Those navies that have STOVL platforms but don't operate STOVL aircraft off of them)
    1. UK
    2. Japan
    3. South Korea
  4. Navies with Carrier qualified Air assets
    1. Argentina
The Australians will be moving into the third category while the Brits and the Indians will be moving into the first

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Type 21 On Steroids: Brazil's Niteroi-Class FFGsPosted: September 26th, 2011, 8:03 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Sorry, have I missed something? I thought this was about the Niteroi class?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Type 21 On Steroids: Brazil's Niteroi-Class FFGsPosted: September 27th, 2011, 12:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
Sorry about derailing this,

In all a fine drawing and I am a big fan of the Brasil

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Timothy Derails Niteroi thread with carrier tangentPosted: September 27th, 2011, 3:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Yeah. Ooops.

Topic split from here.

Sorry everyone.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Timothy Derails Niteroi thread with carrier tangentPosted: September 27th, 2011, 4:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Thanks, Tim! Much appreciated.

_________________
My Avatar:ΠŸΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ АлСксССвич Π‘Π΅Π·ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ² (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Π’ΠΈΡ†Π΅-Π°Π΄ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π°Π» , царская Π’ΠœΠ€ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 8 posts ]  Return to β€œOff Topic”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]