Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 12 of 52  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page « 110 11 12 13 1452 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 25th, 2011, 7:11 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Just guessing, but smaller ammo capacity and a conventional turret would go a long way.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SINJOORTJE
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 26th, 2011, 12:03 am
Offline
Posts: 66
Joined: July 22nd, 2011, 12:13 am
Just wondering, does SPY-3 look that different from SPY-1? And can the MK. 26 fire a harpoon?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 26th, 2011, 12:09 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9101
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
SINJOORTJE wrote:
Just wondering, does SPY-3 look that different from SPY-1? And can the MK. 26 fire a harpoon?
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=1261&start=0


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 26th, 2011, 12:56 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Mk 26 GMLS can fire Harpoon.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SINJOORTJE
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 30th, 2011, 1:56 am
Offline
Posts: 66
Joined: July 22nd, 2011, 12:13 am
There are a couple of SAM missiles that I have seen around ship bucket that are not in any part sheets. And one of them looks like a small SM-3. I also heard of a SM-6.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 30th, 2011, 3:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
SM-6 is externally identical to the SM-2ER Block 4.

I'd have to see the exact sam you are referencing to know what you are talking about.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 30th, 2011, 6:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
A minor nit, but shouldn't the hedgehog be facing right seeing as how it's an ahead throwing weapon.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: August 31st, 2011, 2:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Not sure if these qualify as smallcraft but here they are.
[ img ]

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cybermax
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: September 3rd, 2011, 12:35 pm
Offline
Posts: 331
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:41 pm
Northrop Grumman concept of a laser on a Burke DDG.

[ img ]

http://www.militaryaerospace.com/index/ ... level.html


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USN SystemsPosted: September 3rd, 2011, 4:18 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Interesting. VLS seems entirely preserved. Laser subsystems housed in a hangar bay, maybe? Certainly Burkes don't have a ton of spare volume back there (or anywhere else).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 12 of 52  [ 518 posts ]  Return to “Official Parts Sheets” | Go to page « 110 11 12 13 1452 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]