_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Posts:582 Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Oh yes, I want one!
(did you recognize the torpedo tubes ?)
_________________ This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead
Posts:309 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:Website
On the subject of those magazines, it'd be cool to see a draw of that hilarious container ship from one of PopSci's recent issues. That thing, although I haven't the slightest idea about its feasibility, is sexy.
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Do you have a pic?
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error
Posts:5376 Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Looks doable enough from a physical perspective, but from an economic perspective? Mixed cargo and passenger ships died with the advent of the container. The only exception is RO/PAX ships, but they are the exception.
Also, what are those fins on the top?
_________________ “Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error