Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
Author Message
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 14th, 2011, 9:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Two rudders. The props and rudders are in the same setup as the North Carolina, South Dakota and Iowa classes.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 14th, 2011, 9:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Not the way you've drawn it now. Right now the rudder is either on the centerline or further to port.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 14th, 2011, 9:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
I used this configuration for the rudders and the propellers:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 14th, 2011, 9:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I got that, but the way you've drawn your rudder it's either on the centerline or further to port

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 14th, 2011, 9:34 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
All other drawings of other US battleships and other ships with two rudders has it drawn the same way.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 14th, 2011, 9:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Not quite. In order to show what you're trying to show you would have to draw something along these lines:
[ img ]
Unless the area aft of the props are completely flat that is, but as far as I'm aware, it isn't.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eltf177
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 15th, 2011, 9:38 am
Offline
Posts: 503
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 5:03 pm
Thiel wrote:
eltf177 wrote:
1) The mixed Secondary Batteries suggest a laydown date around the end of WWI, but these look far more modern than that. Ditto with the aviation arrangements, they look too modern for the period.
Not quite. The 3in guns are part of the aa armament and as such falls outside the traditional system of primary, secondary, etc battery in much the same way the 40mm does.
Around this time the 3-inch/50 AA gun was being supplanted with the 5-inch/25, the 5-inch/38 was the primary DP gun of WW2. The 5-inch/51 is an anti-surface gun, some of which were later used as shore batteries (most notably at Wake Island).

It really looks to me like your ships have 3 shafts and 1 rudder as well...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 16th, 2011, 1:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
According to springsharp the Delaware 1942 refit is underpowered or underperforming relative to the displacement.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 16th, 2011, 4:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
Karle94 wrote:
According to springsharp the Delaware 1942 refit is underpowered or underperforming relative to the displacement.
It should, as she is basically armed the same as the South Dakota, but with a far thinner deck (1.5" vs 1.5"+6") and lacks SoDak's heavyweight 'command and control' equipment... but is over 3000t heavier (standard displacement).

The deck armor need a massive increase- to at least 4" and possibly 5"- and a decapping deck needs to be added- another 1.5" or so- then displacement needs to be trimmed as much as is practicable to leave the hull full enough to support the guns.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SrGopher
Post subject: Re: Delaware class BattleshipPosted: August 21st, 2011, 5:48 pm
Offline
Posts: 371
Joined: April 13th, 2011, 9:21 pm
5"/51s were developed as surface weapons, with a low angle. Not suitable for AAW. Other than that, it is still a great design.

By the way, if you want additional heavy AA weapons, the 5"/25s would make a great weapon for an inter-war period battleship design like this.

_________________
Worklist:
Puerto Oeste - AU - WWI-WWII


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 25 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]