Shipbucket

FIXED

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None

very nice. but hate to be a party pooper, but wouldnt it just be more realistic for the RCN to adopt the Dutch JSS design? I mean the design is already set it contains all the same overall capablities and they can share parts and CONOPS with the Dutch, maybe even drive the cost of the R&D down so the Dutch can buy a forth or it can be put on the market.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets

Beautifull design MC Spoilt! Especially the topvieuw

_________________
“The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person who is doing it.”

@Philbob : The RCN and RNLN did some research together but then at a point they disagreed on some points of the JSS so they didnt worked more together. the folowing quote is quoted from a letter from the MOD to the government (03-12-2009) here an extra Updat on the JSS, now working on the vehicle-deck internal, are their any topvieuw drawings of (canadian) vehicle's in SB size?

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None

It's still is superb drawing

I just made a sort of spin off of the JSS, here an LPD version. just for fun hope you guys like it again.

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None

Very nice I don't know if you have seen in but here: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=50&start=50 is a 3d model of a JSS based on yours. I hope you like it.

I thought the Canadian navy had picked the S92? though like the Merlins much better option

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian

They have, but it's a controversial choice.

Now before I proceed, I just want to put up a disclaimer: IIRC. I could be wrong, but I also know the original sources where I heard this and so I can go back and verify if questioned (airliners.net, BTW)

Anyway, half the problem is contractual, since between the Canadian government, and Sikorsky, it's basically a contractual cluster****

The other half is safety-related since Sikorsky basically liked about how long the main rotor transmission can run "dry" (i.e., without oil) in an emergency situation, leading to a number of fatal crashes. Of course, the fact that relatively so many pilots had to test that claim out for themselves is unsettling, too. Personally, I'd be hesitant as hell to get on an S92. I'd sooner get on an Osprey.

Yeah , i did see the 3D model of the JSS , proud to inspire someone with a drawing.

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None