Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 4  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
Cipher53
Post subject: US Next Generation FrigatePosted: July 19th, 2011, 5:14 am
Offline
Posts: 5
Joined: July 13th, 2011, 9:04 pm
First post on the forums, and not posted in the beginner's section because I don't intend to draw it shipbucket style.

[ img ]

I'm working on an upgrade package for the OHP for a project for another site, and used a shipbucket design for a starting point because it looked rather good in comparison to some other stuff that I've seen out there. For the most part its the same weaponry, but now I'm going back to rework the drawing and I've got mediocre feedback from one place that I went to for advice, so I was hoping to get some feedback here.

My current plans ATM are;
  • Replace the VLS cell with a Mk-26 launcher. Was told by some members on another site that I wouldn't be able to fit the complete suite of missiles that I'd intended from it (Similar armament to the Arleigh Burke) with the VLS cells, and nobody replied to my post inquiring whether or not the Mk-26 would fit or not, so that's a go..
  • Remove armament at midships, replace with extended superstructure.
I'd also thought of moving the bridge area back, but nobody responded to that either and I rather like the way that the forward superstructure looks at the moment..

Does anybody here have any input? (Non-consistent of complaining about the styling. I'm already well aware after lurking here how some of you feel about SB/GB/Whatever Bucket you want to talk about styling)


Last edited by Cipher53 on July 25th, 2011, 6:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 7:57 am
wtf, why is that watermark credit there?


Top
[Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 8:59 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Yes the copyrigth of all shipbucket drawings, be their as altered as possible still remains to the orginal artists and for the shipbucket community

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 11:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Why upgrade the Perry to carry Burke level armament?
The entire point of the Perry is to be cheap and numerous. This was achieved by shrink wrapping it around the minimum necessary systems required for its mission. Start fitting it with AEGIS etc and price will go up drastically, which means it won't be numerous and therefore it will have failed its primary mission.

And I agree with Alvama. Why the watermark?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ReiAyanami
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 11:45 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 136
Joined: June 29th, 2011, 4:46 pm
Location: Athens, Greece
Also, I think they have a lot of aluminium, especially in the superstructure, which won't allow any more weight added on top without seriously rebuilding the ship. Unless of course it is a fantasy design, in whixh case it is great.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 11:53 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
The OHP was built to be in numbers in order to escort convoys. This task was for the newer WWII destroyers such as the Fletcher, Sumner and Gearing classes well into the 60`s-70`s. When the OHP began to appear in numbers they took over this role. If you want a refit of the OHP, try something a little less extensive, costly and more practical and more relevant to escort duty. This looks a lot like the Spanish frigate Alvaro De Bazan.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 12:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
That's not an upgrade, that's an all new ship.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 12:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
This^, the forward superstructure is nothing similar to what I remember from my visit to the HMAS Melbourne (an Aussie OHP)

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 2:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
apart from the watermark and the wrong or old parts, I cannot think of any reason why this is in non-sb section.....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Oliver Hazard Perry Class Upgrade ProjectPosted: July 19th, 2011, 2:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
TimothyC wrote:
That's not an upgrade, that's an all new ship.
This as well. As I said, the Perry class is essentially shrink-wrapped around its systems, making it almost impossible to rearrange its innards.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 4  [ 36 posts ]  Return to “Non-Shipbucket Drawings” | Go to page 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]