Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 8  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 58 »
Author Message
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: June 8th, 2011, 12:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
I'm busy to figure out a task for Bezobrazov, but only to show I haven't forgot USS Sacramento I'll give you the latest improvements. But there still a lot to do. ;)
:?: In that connection I'll ask if anyone knows where the second 12,7mm HMG at starboard side was placed? Also where the MK36 super RBOC where placed? I can't find any picture wher they are shown, but I positively know she was equipped with these :?
[ img ]

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: June 17th, 2011, 12:06 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Now it begins to look good. I'm finish with the fore superstructure and the mast's. The aft superstructure has still a lot of work, and the hull lacks the detail finishing. I think though it's possible to sense how the outcome will be like now ;)
[ img ]

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: June 17th, 2011, 5:11 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Nice work, but the hull shading is moving into non-standard territory.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
darthpanda
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: June 17th, 2011, 9:31 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3429
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:14 pm
Location: HOLLAND!!!!!!!
Contact: Website
and you should remove the sonar from the helicopter.

_________________
Worklist:
- Victorian Navy - LINK
- ROC/Taiwan - 中華民國空軍 / 陸軍航特部 / 海軍航空兵 - LINK
- RHKAAF / HKGFS - 皇家香港輔助空軍 / 政府飛行服務隊
- Gunbucket - LINK

天滅中共全黨死清光!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: June 24th, 2011, 3:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
darthpanda wrote:
and you should remove the sonar from the helicopter.
Change is made ;)

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: July 10th, 2011, 11:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Thiel wrote:
Nice work, but the hull shading is moving into non-standard territory.
Thiel are you thinking of the hull shade above the stabilisators? If that's the case, I have to tell that's because of the hulls shape. I don't think it should have a black outline because the edge isn't sharp but bended. I'm not a marine engineer but maybe this hull shape is one of the reasons for these vessels fastness?

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: July 11th, 2011, 4:56 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
The Mk 95 illuminator is already drawn and present on the US parts sheet (possibly mislabeled). Please use it unless you can give compelling reason otherwise.

Otherwise it's a fine drawing, if atypical style-wise.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: July 11th, 2011, 8:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
erik_t wrote:
The Mk 95 illuminator is already drawn and present on the US parts sheet (possibly mislabeled). Please use it unless you can give compelling reason otherwise.

Otherwise it's a fine drawing, if atypical style-wise.
Thanks. If the Mk 95 illuminator are the two light grey on top of the fore superstructure, I originally used them from the US parts sheet. But when I studied close ups pictures they were inaccurate compelled to USS Sacramento. That's why ;)

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: July 11th, 2011, 9:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
KimWerner wrote:
erik_t wrote:
The Mk 95 illuminator is already drawn and present on the US parts sheet (possibly mislabeled). Please use it unless you can give compelling reason otherwise.

Otherwise it's a fine drawing, if atypical style-wise.
Thanks. If the Mk 95 illuminator are the two light grey on top of the fore superstructure, I originally used them from the US parts sheet. But when I studied close ups pictures they were inaccurate compelled to USS Sacramento. That's why ;)
I'd love to see your sources, but until the modified part get approved use of the current standard part is preferred.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: US Fast Combat Support Ships (T-AOE)Posted: July 11th, 2011, 9:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
TimothyC wrote:
KimWerner wrote:
erik_t wrote:
The Mk 95 illuminator is already drawn and present on the US parts sheet (possibly mislabeled). Please use it unless you can give compelling reason otherwise.

Otherwise it's a fine drawing, if atypical style-wise.
Thanks. If the Mk 95 illuminator are the two light grey on top of the fore superstructure, I originally used them from the US parts sheet. But when I studied close ups pictures they were inaccurate compelled to USS Sacramento. That's why ;)
I'd love to see your sources, but until the modified part get approved use of the current standard part is preferred.
[ img ]

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 8  [ 76 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 58 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]