Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
sebu
Post subject: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 4:35 pm
Offline
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am
Here is my first real design :) She is 109 years old Lady and still running; with diesel though.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carnac
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 4:37 pm
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
The hull could use a bit more shading, I'm not sure if I see any at all

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 4:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
nice, a few comments though:
where exactly is the main deck? seeing from your railing, it is on the black lines, but the 'gap' in the bulwark and the positions of a door and the scuttles seem to show it lower
also, the hull shading isn't entirely correct. following sb? yes, but it does not show the hull correclty, if I'm correct. the widest point of the hull should not be the point you have your prop, so somewhere the hull should shape towards a skeg or something.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 4:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
nice, a few comments though:
where exactly is the main deck? seeing from your railing, it is on the black lines, but the 'gap' in the bulwark and the positions of a door and the scuttles seem to show it lower
That would be because the deck is raised from the deckhouse and aft.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 4:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
possibly, but the scuttles don't raise and the door of the bridge seems to be lower as well... not matching up with the railing. hence why I am a bit puzzled.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 5:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
According to this picture the scuttles under the deckhouse isn't scuttles after all, but proper windows, and they are mounted higher.
[ img ]

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 5:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
that explains it.... now he should show it.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 5:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
[ img ]
This picture shows it even more clearly.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
sebu
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 6:18 pm
Offline
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am
Thanks for comments gents. A little update...better?


Last edited by sebu on June 28th, 2011, 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: MS InttiPosted: June 28th, 2011, 6:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
If the drawing I posted is to be believed, then the underwater hull should be either black or very dark grey.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]