We have no infrastructure for heavy naval artillery, nobody does.
It's for an AU.
But either way, establishing infrastructure for such a thing would be no different than establishing infrastructure for any other ship part. If you need it, you build it.
The problem is you're assuming there will be high value targets in the future, which with the current warfare is a doubtful proposition.
I'm not assuming anything. Everything I used for design considerations came from the Colonel's thesis.
You would need to have almost a hundred meters beam, possible but not a good idea.
Not at all. Where do you come up with these wild assumptions? Wouldn't even need half that.
You don't have room behind the plates for many of your phased array radars.
Sure it does. I moved the arm launchers that Thiel noted could be an issue. Other than that, the arrays have a little more room for placement than a Burke does.
Besides that, no reactor in the world would power that many expensive, delicate and heavy radars for very long.
Sure they could. That was discussed a couple pages ago. Takes about 14-15 MW. So about 2.5 times the radar capacity of a Burke (and it's power usage for said radars).
Your turrets are geometrically impossible, regaurdless of where you took them from.
Again, you don't know what your talking about. There's nothing geometrically impossible about them.