Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 44 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Go to page « 142 43 44 45 46 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 12:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
I have designed her with one ski-jump and 6 catapults (4 standard, one extra long and 1 which overlaps the other). She is equipped with 5 lifts and one extra large lift on the aft deck built into the aft deck.

flight-deck is unusually wide (up to 70 meters at its very widest)

Engine: 6 geared steam turbines, 4 × shafts 443,000 shp
speed: limited to 36,3 knots (Because of excessive strain on the hull)
Complement: 6200 + 1300 marins or more.
Armor: classified
Aircraft carried: Hold up to 120 (normaly 90)

Motto: "Slightly large!"

[ img ]

comments


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 12:34 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
could I see an (basic) top view so I can see the runway arrangement? I am wondering.......
also, the liferafts postion isn't very good under those hatches, because when your power goes ofline, you can't acces them.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 12:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
could I see an (basic) top view so I can see the runway arrangement? I am wondering.......
also, the liferafts postion isn't very good under those hatches, because when your power goes ofline, you can't acces them.
They don't have to be power operated.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 1:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
System 1 is, you can manually open them with a crank shaft.
System 2, should the hatch be so damaged that you can't open them with the crank shaft, then you can use explosive charges placed around the hatch that will theoretically blow out the hatch.

is not 100% sure on the 6 catapult. the Ski-jump is there more as an extra equipment for aircraft as Vtol aircraft.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 1:43 pm
AWESOME!


Top
[Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 1:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
hmm. where would the conventional aircraft land?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 2:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
acelanceloet wrote:
hmm. where would the conventional aircraft land?
from behind!? if the aft elevator is not in the way. can always remove it.

any suggestions


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 2:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
well, here is the problem, with some solutions:
you have an straight landing deck, I suppose. that means you can't launch and recover aircraft at the same time, because most of your catapults are crossed by the landing track, or the aircraft can't get to the catapult.

the best idea (IMHO) would be to remove the aft elevator, and let aircraft 'cross' the deck from there towards the 2 catapults you have at the other side. most likely you have to remove or move one, to create an clear path, and I don't know if it is an problem to let the landing aircraft cross your 'long' catapult.
hey, look what we now got! it is the same arrangement as the nimitz, + an added ski jump + one longer catapult! (basically)

also, re the jump.... I see no reason why VTOL aircraft could not use the catapult or at least the start deck. so I don't know if it is an good idea to waste deck space for that ski-jump.

another idea might be an X-carrier, as for example one of the Vikrant concepts was : http://www.defencetalk.com/pictures/dat ... nt_c02.jpg. it might be possible to do something like that with catapults, but I am not sure.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 3:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
CATOVL ;)

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: June 20th, 2011, 3:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
ezgo394 wrote:
CATOVL ;)
Except carriers in this size class tend toward full on CATOBAR* or STOBAR.

He's got the size for a full CATOBAR carrier, so that's what I'd suggest.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 44 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 142 43 44 45 46 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]