» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 4  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Carnac
Post subject: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 5:28 am
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
------redone------
[ img ]

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.


Last edited by Carnac on June 22nd, 2011, 6:02 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 5:32 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Very not bad, but:

- stretch the hull out. A lot. It needs to be longer.

- Seaplanes need catapults. They don't just sit on the deck.

Some of the placement of the secondaries seems awkward, but no big deal to me.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 5:37 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I can't help but notice that you have a hatch that leads outside a goodly two meters above the deck.
Also, you're seriously over equipped with secondaries. You have almost as many as a KGV class battleship and four times as many as an E class light cruiser.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Last edited by Thiel on June 20th, 2011, 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carnac
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 5:38 am
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Thiel wrote:
I can't help but notice that you have a hatch that leads outside a goodly two meters above the deck.
As I said, it was to place deck levels, not for convinent suicides :P

edit: updoot
[ img ]

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 5:42 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Carnac wrote:
Thiel wrote:
I can't help but notice that you have a hatch that leads outside a goodly two meters above the deck.
As I said, it was to place deck levels, not for convinent suicides :P
Ah, didn't see that.
Anyway, you're seriously over equipped with secondaries. You have almost as many as a KGV class battleship and four times as many as an E class light cruiser.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 6:08 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
Doesn't it need a crane to get the seaplane back on board?

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carnac
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 6:14 am
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
[ img ]

Last update of the night, I have edumacations in the morning.

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 7:21 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I suggest you take a look at PBs excellent Leander class, since you seem to be aiming at a miniature version of that.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 7:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Probably the Arethusa class, given the three twin 6-in mounts; if he cares to look into the archive.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: First WW2 Attempt (Unnamed Light Cruiser)Posted: June 20th, 2011, 7:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Yeah, hadn't thought about those.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 4  [ 38 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]