Shipbucket

Canada has some jets over there, but not a lot.

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.

This rational and thoughtful post is insufficiently vitriolic and frothing and has no place here.

Nearly all warships go to breakers at the end of their lives, even those that gave proud service for many years. There frankly isn't enough dock space in the world to make a museum ship out of every worthy candidate, and if we were to do so, the lack of visitors to any given ship would put them in a state quite more pathetic than proud and shiny razor blades. This is how the world works.

Although I agree with those with the point of being realistic, the 'sad' or 'shocking' side of this story is not only that one of our historic ships is being chopped up, but that for the next ten years there will be no fixed-wing fleet air arm flying from carriers. Experience passed on from aircrews and other key carrier roles will be to some extent lost. Sea Harrier squadrons will be wrapped up and we will have a very limited overseas defence capability. Part of another shambolic defence review.

Just look at Argentina's posturing over the Falkland Islands recently: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13803111. Would this sort of thing really be happening if our military - navy in particular - wasn't a shadow of it's former self?

_________________

Jabba's Worklist

Also, How about we stay out of other countries such as Libya, and use the money saved on the defence of our own country?

_________________

Jabba's Worklist

Plus, people forget that the history of the RN is literally over half a millennia old, and ships come and go. They scrapped Warspite, after all, and it's honestly somewhat of a wonder they kept Belfast at all.

The way I look at it, the RN doesn't see a pressing need to preserve warships because they live on more than well enough in tradition.

In my experience this is a point that is hard to get across with many people, especially Americans. They forget just how unusual their position really is. The USN has been around for app 200 years and for about half that time it was a very small one. At the same time they have one of the worlds largest countries to spread museum ships around.
Compare this to somewhere like Denmark. We've had a standing navy for 501 years and until fairly recently it was even a comparatively big one. (In 1807 it was one of the largest in the world) Yet we only have 5 million people to support it, and fairly limited space to put museum ships.
If we had preserved the same percentage of ships as the the US, we'd have literally hundreds of them. The Situation is even worse for the RN since they're a whole lot larger.

You get the same sort of thing when talking about how much history you should learn in school. All the Americans I know knows a whole lot more about US history than I do about Danish and the reason is quite simple. There's a whole lot more history to teach, but the same time to teach it in.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

Darn it; sorry again, so, blanket apology for every nation currently involved in the Libyan war
But yes, we all hate to see what once a shiny war machine being chopped up, or rusting away. On the A1 motorway north of where I live is the hulk of a Lightning inteceptor, sitting in scrap yard with graffitti painted over it; and I find this sad; but then I'm probbaly anthropamormhasing (if that's how its spelt!) an inanimate object. My ex father in law retired from the army as a colonel in the Intelligence Corp, and ended up working in his local supermarket stocking shelves; and he once said to me: "the only thing old in this country they don't preserve is people". And the only reason the Belfast and other old warships were saved is because they were in the right place at the right time to attract financial support. The Warspite should have been saved and placed alongside the Victory as a superb example of a dreadnought, but at least the old girl didn't go without a struggle.

The once mighty Royal Navy down to a mere helo carrier and 19 frigates. Hows the sub force? About 15 subs? Oh but that's still just way too large. You need to cut more.

Would you rather spend billions on large (or more correctly, regular sized) defence forces or face economic collapse? I would be thrilled in Canada could raise 2 or 3 more Brigades, launch 10 new warships (including a Carrier) and buy up more than a handful of CF-35's to defend the vast north, but It's just not a viable option in these times. When times are tough, most governments regardless to political stripe, will look at the Army with all its technology and say"do more with less" and 9 out of 10 times that is what happens. The Defence cuts are not unique to one country. It sucks, but for the next 10-20 years I don't see increased defence budgets anywhere in the West.

_________________
When Britain first, at Heaven's command
Arose from out the azure main;
This was the charter of the land,
And guardian angels sang this strain:

"Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:
"Britons never will be slaves."

Well I guess we'll be finding out real soon where the real problem is when nations no longer have defense budgets to cut.