Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 7 of 11  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page « 15 6 7 8 911 »
Author Message
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 18th, 2011, 4:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Edit: Updated my T43 with a new 1022 radar and Abbey Hill ESM.

[ img ]

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 4:31 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Very, very nice, Miho, though, personally I doubt the MoD would've chosen an Admiral's name, and, quite possibly not the ill-fated on of Hood's. In fact, I can imagine, if such a name would've been ultimately chosen, then Fraser (Lord Fraser of North Cape) or Sommerville (Sir James Sommerville) or Cunningham (Lord Cunningham of Hyndhope) would've been much more politically correct; and even Mountbatten (Lord Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl of M.; previously known as Prince Louis of Battenberg and his son Earl Mountbatten, 2nd Marquess of Milford Haven) - If I were to save these drawings, those are among the names I'd prefer to put on the ships!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 9:07 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
IMHO the names would either be cities or counties in line with recent naming policy. Blake seems to have been the last ship named after an admiral.
And quite frankly where the convention for naming carriers after Royalty came from is open to question too. :?

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 9:42 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Agree with you there. Only reason why I even considered the admirals' name option were the fact that IRL there were a number of Type42s (and later Type22s that were named after towns... - but speaking of...HMS Southampton was available... :D - But, of course, one could assume that, if these were to have been built the other, later classes would've had to be named after other entities...

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 9:46 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Hood wrote:
IMHO the names would either be cities or counties in line with recent naming policy. Blake seems to have been the last ship named after an admiral.
And quite frankly where the convention for naming carriers after Royalty came from is open to question too. :?


Traditionally the First Sea Lord suggests names these then have to be approved by the monarch.It does get confusing when they mix names in the same class,such as an admiral and a cat as in the Tigers. :? Also the splended cats ie Lion class battlecruisers when the majority of the class were named after royals.But thats the Brits for you.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 9:51 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
So was it that Winston Churchill's suggestion to name the battleship Queen Elizabeth (1912) after Cromwell was vetoed by King Geoerge V...all for the better, we may agree on...

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 10:06 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
:lol: Yeah thats a bit of hypocrasy at work there seeing as he and indeed Battenberg had to change their own names a few years later.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 3:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
The Kaisers priceless quip, when the British Royal family changed their name to 'Windsor' "Are we now to have the Merry Wives of Sax-Coburg and Gotha?". But yes the convention seems to be staying with non admiral names; though I beleive Prince Charles has agreed that one of the new carriers should now be named Ark Royal.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 3:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Ah sheesh. From what I remember (it's been a few years since I did the first T43) I just chose it because it was a nice name, not because I had any significant meaning for it. I'm perfectly willing to put the name of a county on there.

Norfolk Class sounds good to all involved?

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Type 43 DestroyerPosted: June 19th, 2011, 5:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Nah, turnip eaters bor, reckon you'm want Cambridge :D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 7 of 11  [ 103 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 15 6 7 8 911 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]