Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 4  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 3:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Of course, it could also reverse to the usual SpruCan Madness.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 3:36 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
You wouldn't believe how many iterations of my own Sprucan have come and gone. They have their own directory in my file structure.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 4:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
erik_t wrote:
You wouldn't believe how many iterations of my own Sprucan have come and gone. They have their own directory in my file structure.
Oh I can. I started drawing SB drawings about a year ago, and since then I've seen at least thirty or forty different bashes of extremely varying quality. (Seriously, we're talking KillerBunni bad and DP good)
And I've never understood why it's so popular a hull. Sure, the USN did their own kitbashing with it in real life (Kidd and Tico) but still.
It's old, not particularly stealthy and it certainly isn't pretty.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 5:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Probably because it's large, relatively cheap, proven, designed with modularity in mind and has good hullspeed characteristics.

Also, pretty is a subjective matter - and one that doesn't factor in in warship design.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 6:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
klagldsf wrote:
Probably because it's large, relatively cheap, proven, designed with modularity in mind and has good hullspeed characteristics.

Also, pretty is a subjective matter - and one that doesn't factor in in warship design.
True, but most of the kitbashes are of the "Look how Cool it is!!!" variety. One would think a more imposing ship would be more popular.
The Spruance is just bland.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 7:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
I'm actually surprised that people don't use Burke hulls more often. When I was doing the Republic of Libya AU, I was trying to design a small helicopter carrier (four to five copters capacity) on a Burke hull because, well, that's what's in production right now.

Also, let's continue this conversation in TurretHead's thread, I don't want to detract from erik_t's stuff anymore.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 7:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
'kay

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Raven
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 30th, 2010, 8:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 107
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 6:30 am
Location: San Diego, Ca.
Contact: Website, Yahoo Messenger
Oops, my bad.

_________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces

By This Sign You Will Conquer


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: August 31st, 2010, 9:19 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Golly, if you're floating around out there in the aether, I would still appreciate some ESM/ECM guidance (no pun intended).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: 255m LWL Soviet C(B)GNPosted: November 8th, 2010, 9:31 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Great for an AU Soviet Empire! or something like this.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 4  [ 40 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]