Shipbucket

ah thanks.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Perhaps a system that wasn't canceled would be better, such as the Eagle Eye or (albiet quite large) Firescout

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.

I'm aware that Seamos-project is cancelled. However, there are other AU-features in this ship so I'll leave it that way. I removed Millenium to demostrate its module-feature; should I draw it fixed or "levitated"?

Well....she suffer from nordic naval sickness, she is to cramped!
- Remove the helicopter hangar, fit just a pad, but even that is taking up alot of space.
- Go dreadnought, just one caliber, I think you should go with two 57mm mk110 and two 9LW mk3 directors. Maybe supprted by 12,7mm HMG i LEMUR mountings.
-12 SAMs and 8 RBS 15 is enough. The SSMs should prefably be fitted on the deck to preserve space in the supoerstruckture.
- Ship needs to be lengthen at least 20m to be good ship.

_________________
Dieu et mon droit
Solus dux nullus ductus

Worklist
All Royal Swedish Navy units from 1522 to present

I Agree
I don't agree
More your ship is large, more this ship was expensive
and don't forget the "small Nordic" military budget

Ok, thanks again for comments fellows. How about this? A bit larger, basically a Meko A-100 variant, as named; a hybrid of Kedah and Braunschweig. Few AU features though; Hellfire launcher doesn't exists, I'm not sure of VL RAM (is it installed?), MG supposed to be gau19/A. The mine type might be new for you?

why did you get rid of the I-mast? it was perfect for this ship! in the current setup I would use the 100 though....
I have doubts about the amount of anti-ship missiles: 4 to one side and 2 to the other seems a bit too much to me. 2 to each side seems more then enough for this ship.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

I agree I-mast might be better. However, I wanted to follow previous drawed A100s of MConrads. And believe me, there is nothing enough when we are talking of small and poor Navy...

Hmm....
Still overloaded and cramped.
What kind of ship do you want to have
- Poor man's frigate (K130/ A69) or a FPB with endurance (Visby)?

For a poor man's frigate go with
26-27kts speed
127mm and 57mm gun
helikopter with hanger
fitted for but not with SSMs

For a FPB with endurance
30-35kts speed
57mm gun
8 SSM
RAM launceher
No helicopter and hangar

Skip the vls, where will you fit the crew? They need accomodation, messes and so on.
Size is good but I doubt the hangar will fit. Replace the 76mm OTO falera gun with a Bofors 57mm MK 3.

_________________
Dieu et mon droit
Solus dux nullus ductus

Worklist
All Royal Swedish Navy units from 1522 to present

Visby seems to be obvious choice for this subject, after all...