Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 8th, 2011, 3:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
acelanceloet wrote:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Images/Vikrant02.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NjHp5DLYx9o/T ... 00/IAC.JPG
3 oto 76's are stated to be on board and were in the initial specs as well
[ img ]
LOL :lol:
ah yeah, this drawing with a F-15 to take off
This drawing is a big joke
:lol:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 8th, 2011, 3:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
all versions show it, all information as well. the fact that they used 'just an plane that would never get on' is not an reason to discard everything else?
personally, I think they used an impossible one on purpose, because it is not known which aircraft will in the end operate from it.

don't you think that it is really weird that an drawing that is 'a big joke' looks almost perfectly like the only official model known?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 8th, 2011, 4:19 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
That isnt an F-15 colo.
That is the new proposal for a carrier based jet for India.
Pershkant or something like that its called. Got canceled like 2 years ago.
Ashkunt(I believe it was called like this is their new plan)

And they also got a 5th gen aircraft running for a place on board of the carriers/air force. But i read this will be at 2018+ somewhere only...

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 10:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
last fixes made. now it is suitable for upload :D

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 11:18 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Looks good, though I think you need some shading on the foremast, under the elevators and under the gang ways.
There's also some grey outlines on the foremast that should be black

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 11:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
under the elevators is shading, the foremast is taken from the original drawing by enrr... but I'll take a look at it -.- couldn't you say this earlier? it was already in my uploads folder.....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 11:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
fixes made. now she's really ready for upload....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 11:54 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
under the elevators is shading, the foremast is taken from the original drawing by enrr... but I'll take a look at it -.- couldn't you say this earlier? it was already in my uploads folder.....
I realize the shading is there, however, you have to zoom in 200%+ to see it. I'd go for quite a bit more contrast. Maybe even two pixels wide under the elevators.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 11:57 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I can see it clearly myself. I keep it like this. on the mast is another story... but the overhang there isn't that great.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: INS Vikrant 2012Posted: June 9th, 2011, 12:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
You make this drawing ugly as hell with your non thinking ideas.
You pick items (you stated on msn) without thinking, and just by ''Oh then i dont have to draw it''.
I give comment about it, and you say i am irritating.

Good luck on this drawing wich you only draw for the credits (That is what it looks like)

Also nice arrogant reply from you.
acelanceloet wrote:
I can see it clearly myself. I keep it like this. on the mast is another story... but the overhang there isn't that great.
You know the funny thingy?
You comment on everybodies drawing (about 75%) for changes.
They change it, no matter if it is good or false.

But when somebody comments on YOU.
You say those changes are or not needed, or YOU THINK it isnt needed, even if it does.


A few visions on this.

The Chilian M frigate, 7 peeps tell you that you made it the wrong shape, to low, to long. You say no, because you see it different.
And also that sail boat, and some others. Will take some time to dig it all up if you want.

Its time to change, dont be arrogant and think you arnt the one doing all of this, do it for the creating of ships in the archive, and listen to others.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 36 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]