Shipbucket

and now you have another problem: that foot was used from the M-frigates onward.... commisioned in 1991.
ow and now the WM-22's view is blocked by the funnel... that means blind spots forward and aft, so not an good idea

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Your ship looks too small compared to the embarked aircraft. There is no room for a hangar in that hull, on top of the usual parts a ship has (engines, accomodation, etc.). Also the bridge structure is too low - see the helocopter in front of the bridge to get the idea.

_________________
Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"

I have to agree with the critics who have pointed out that your carrier project is too small for the intended role. Not only doesn't she have enough internal volume; more critical even is the fact that she doesn't have enough freeboard and, thus metacentric height to be able to even remotely be able to operate any aircraft in either the Atlantic or the Pacific. In other words: lengthen her substantially and raise her freeboard with, at least, a couple of deck levels!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen