Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 4  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 4:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Thiel wrote:
Because what they do amounts to piracy. Had they done what they do on land they would have been charged with several degrees of assault, trespassing, breaking and entering, irresponsible driving and a host of other crimes.
Personally, I take a dim view on that.
Don't they fly the Jolly Roger too?

_________________
๐Œ๐€๐“๐‡๐๐„๐“- ๐‘ป๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’•๐’‚๐’•๐’† ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘บ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 4:45 pm
Not Really true..


Top
[Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 4:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Don't even dare to make this topic flamemable.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 4:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Ignore this post.

_________________
โ€œCloseโ€ only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 5:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
TimothyC wrote:
Thiel wrote:
Because what they do amounts to piracy. Had they done what they do on land they would have been charged with several degrees of assault, trespassing, breaking and entering, irresponsible driving and a host of other crimes.
Personally, I take a dim view on that.
Don't they fly the Jolly Roger too?
They do, but that's hardly illegal.

_________________
โ€œCloseโ€ only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 5:35 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Quote:
Don't even dare to make this topic flamemable.
Don't even dare to make this topic flamemable.
Quote:
Too bad the crew are a bunch of ass clowns.
Too late. So can have a bit less of the teenage attitude?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
HMS Sophia
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 6th, 2011, 7:30 pm
Offline
Posts: 863
Joined: May 6th, 2011, 10:34 am
Thiel wrote:
Because what they do amounts to piracy. Had they done what they do on land they would have been charged with several degrees of assault, trespassing, breaking and entering, irresponsible driving and a host of other crimes.
Personally, I take a dim view on that.
Ah okay. I just read up on some of the stuff. I have heard about them before, but never knew some of the stuff.
While their mission is good, their way of going about it is... negligent at the very least. Sorry :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 7th, 2011, 5:37 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
Admirable goals, dangerous actions and heavy equipment seldom mix. Sea Shepard has all of the above, supplemented by a lot of bathtub chemistry and a "it's not illegal if there are no police to arrest you" attitude.

As much as I dislike them, I must say that they did a good job painting the Irwin this year, though- and Rodondo has, as always, done her great justice.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 7th, 2011, 5:51 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
The Jolly Roger - provided that they fly it - would be a legitimate inclusion in a Shipbucket drawing. It's their organizational insignia, and as you'll note, it's not even a Jolly Roger technically - it's not meant to be a sign of intentional lawbreaking.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Lazer_one
Post subject: Re: MV Steve Irwin, 2011Posted: June 7th, 2011, 9:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1453
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:58 am
Location: Milan - Italy
Contact: Website
klagldsf wrote:
The Jolly Roger - provided that they fly it - would be a legitimate inclusion in a Shipbucket drawing. It's their organizational insignia, and as you'll note, it's not even a Jolly Roger technically - it's not meant to be a sign of intentional lawbreaking.
I partially disagree: it does not exists "the" Jolly Roger but each pirat was having its own flag decorates with skull, skeleton,...
From this point of view the Sea Shepard flag becomes one of the last flying jolly roger.
And probably they had much more money than somali pirates, enough money, for ships, for flags, for web site, for press conferences,...

_________________
Lazer_One
[ img ]

Lazer_One's Worlist - Updated 2021

Documentation is always welcome here

Lazer_One's Blog


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 4  [ 34 posts ]  Return to โ€œReal Designsโ€ | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]