Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Demon Lord Razgriz
Post subject: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 12:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i= ... =AME&s=SEA
Quote:
A new surface combatant, previously designated DDG(X), has become the DDG 51 Flight IV, scheduled to begin in 2032 with two ships per year through 2041, except for three ships in 2036. The move means the basic DDG 51 Arleigh Burke-class design, first procured in 1985, will be bought continuously for at least 56 years.
Glorious BurkeSpam shall go on til the End of Days! o/

But seriously, use the same ship(abet upgraded) til almost 2100 given a possible 50 year Lifespan? Now that's running a design into the ground. :/ And we don't even have Flight III yet...

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carnac
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 4:03 am
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Not as bad as the millennium missile, the Sidewinder.
"Air Force Spokeswoman Stephanie Powell noted that due to its relative low cost, versatility, and reliability it is "very possible that the Sidewinder will remain in Air Force inventories through the late 21st century."

But on topic, wouldn't the new hulls be, well, new? Presumably the flight IV and possibly III (idk) would incorporate stealth features, making it a viable combatant.

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 4:55 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The big difference between a Burke and a sidewinder in this situation is that the Sidewinders mission is unlikely to change in that timeframe.
Not so for the Burke.

It should also be noted that once you open it up, the Sidewinder of 2011 would be almost unrecognisable to a technician who worked on the 1956 version.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 7:49 am
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
Wait didnt i told this like 6 years ago?
But na, all those Americans kept saying US navy would only get Futuristic super ships.

Whahahaha. This is so funny.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 1:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Flight IV might as well be futuristic super ship. Hard to imagine all of the technology (that works) from Zumwalt not being folded in.

Of course we could get into nationalistic dickswinging contests if that's what the forum community would prefer.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Demon Lord Razgriz
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 3:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
I'd like to see a technical discussion on what the Flt IV might look like.

Given space issues, I can see the hull being lengthen, and perhaps widen. And nuke propulsion perhaps with reactor developed from those to be used on SSBN(X)?

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carnac
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 5:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 310
Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
I'd suspect it'd have less clutter, and have a more "stealthy" superstructure. But because VLS allows new missiles in old launchers, the weapons shouldn't change too much imo.

Edit: Also obviously new radars, and thus new (or no) directors, etc

_________________
Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 1st, 2011, 5:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:
I'd like to see a technical discussion on what the Flt IV might look like.

Given space issues, I can see the hull being lengthen, and perhaps widen. And nuke propulsion perhaps with reactor developed from those to be used on SSBN(X)?
If EMC2 gets the Polywell reactor working then we could be looking at a drop in replacement for the engines on all of the Burkes, as that is one of the target plant sizes.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Scifibug
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 2nd, 2011, 4:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 250
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 6:35 pm
Location: Titusville, Florida
If the Burkes and other ships go to 70 years (and this I have trouble beliving, Father Ocean is hard on small tincans) is it possible some class of ships may go 100 years of active service and I mean real service, not tied to a dock or goes out to sea twice a year or so. Has this ever been done?
This would be the same as the HMS Indefatigable still serving today. (Which gives me an idea for a AU ship or two) ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: The Hundred Year Ship, BurkeSpam into SPACE!Posted: June 2nd, 2011, 9:04 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
While ships of the Burke heritage will be serving for 70 years, I doubt any individual hull is imagined to serve for more than the usual 30-40.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]