Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: tromp class (gw frigate) 1966 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 7:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
title says it all. the source of the design is unknown, found it in an scan of an booklet of around this date (exact year is guessed from the other contents on the page) and it might just be an landlubbers render of this ship. (it certainly looks like that :P )

it might work though, various parts are in exactly or only slightly moved positions from the real ship.

[ img ]

any comments?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Last edited by acelanceloet on June 2nd, 2011, 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Vossiej
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 7:50 pm
Offline
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:29 am
Location: The Netherlands
Boy that's ugly, best they didn't proceed with this design.

_________________
“The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person who is doing it.”


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 7:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I agree ;)
still, it is an interesting design, and it would look mucht better if they lowered the entire bridge-funnel-radar section one deck....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
You're using the wrong gun. I'm not exactly sure which model you're using, but it should probably be the Modele 1964 or 1968. The only difference between the two as far as I can see is that the 1968 doesn't have onboard sights.
The Modele 100 really needs an update btw.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
is there an difference? could you point me to the right one, as this one is the one placed on the latest gun sheet and .... well.... need to fix it ;)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
Show us the scan!

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The one on the new parts sheet should do the trick. Be aware that the area between the barrel and the cooling line should be whit/transparent and not grey as it appears on the sheet.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Huh...*wiping eyes in disbelief* Better not comment on this. 8-) It's not an ugly duckling...it's not...well, now I know what it is! It's MOBY DICK resurrected!!!! *Running for life away so as not to be devoured!* ;) :D :lol:

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Anoher thing, I'd move the helicopter down closer to the pad. This is just a personal thing though.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: tromp class (gw frigate) 1967 conceptPosted: June 2nd, 2011, 8:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
this is the only reference work.

@ bezo: it's not that bad, is it?

@ thiel: will fix the helo, and I'm looking for the gun right now.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]