Shipbucket

I think I can answer for Timothy here.
If you got the drawings post them!
Just sorting through all the drawings is a big enough job. If he has to draw all the missing planes he wouldn't even be able to finish one sheet.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

I have an idea, How about YOU draw them! I'm trying to sort everything out, not draw everything, and I do have that top view of the X-47B, I didn't include it because when I checked the wingspan it was just outside of the acceptable range, ergo it doesn't get to stay.

Thank you Thiel. That is in fact the case.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

hmmm, what a relatively aggressive reaction
I only gave a opinion, a idea...
I begin to understand why so many "registered" on this forum do not participate and do not collaborate.... (450 + registered, but how many participate in discussions and exchanges ....)
Personally, as I have said repeatedly, infortunatly I have no time (and LACK OF PATIENCE) to draw

To disgust you to participate and give your ideas in this forum

Keep in civil lads...

Timothy has a big enough job without drawing the missing 200 other types not yet drawn. We'll those gaps over time. Let's see what this analysis brings up before we think about what gaps need filling and whether its all that important. As I've said before naval types are of more concern if people want them for carriers that land-based types that "just look cool" on some AU parts sheet.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

Perhaps I should not have underlined and capitalized the word 'you' there (although that bit of frustration had been building for sometime).

Just as a heads up of how these sheets get put together, here is a preview of the 4th Gen sheet. What you see here is what I've produced after I've sorted the aircraft to get the craft I want, and checked lengths, but before I've removed all of the duplicates. The only craft I have found that were drawn, but drawn incorrectly are the Gripens (it looks like the artist took the length for the A/C versions and used that for the B/D, with a corresponding scale-down), and the MiG-29K (but the MiG-29/29A/29M is good!). Somewhat oddly, the old BAe Hawks were in scale while the new ones were not.

The next step for me is obviously cleaning up duplicates and making the sheet look all nice and neat.



And yes there is a typo or two on the sheet.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

SbAAP updates!

The following Boeings that have been posted are out of scale:
727-100 (target length - 266 pixels)
737-400 (target length - 239 pixels)
737-600 (target length - 205 pixels)
737-700 (target length - 221 pixels)
747SP (target length - 367 pixels)
757-300 (target length - 357 pixels)
777-300 (target length - 485 pixels)
787-3 (target length - 372 pixels)
787-8 (target length - 372 pixels)

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

You had take the ''first" drawing of Darth Panda's f-18f super hornet !
Thanks for correct it...

Greetings.

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024

Repost from the Sb Aircraft Discussion Thread:
Things are worse than I thought:

Boeing Analysis

Most of these are out of scale (only the 707s, 747-1/2/3/400, 757-200, 767s, and 777-200 being in scale), with the worse offenders being the 737-3/4/700, and the 747SP with all four of them being more than 10% out of scale.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Excellent project Keep up the good work Tim

something I just found out: you miss my SU-47.... I think it should be on the 5th gen sheet, as an prototype. http://i830.photobucket.com/albums/zz22 ... u-47sb.png

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin