Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Rodondo
Post subject: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 8:50 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
I wanted to see if what a 10,000 tonne displacement battleship looked like if the Germans tried to conform to the treaty (even through they probably could not have been able to make these even in 1922). So I ran the numbers through Springsharp and came up with the following


EDIT-specs on next page

I'll have the first edit up soonish (7+ days?)

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Last edited by Rodondo on May 24th, 2011, 10:54 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eltf177
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 10:16 am
Offline
Posts: 503
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 5:03 pm
Rodondo wrote:
Versaille, Germany Dreadnought laid down 1924

No drive to shaft, 2 shafts, 20,672 shp / 15,422 Kw = 20.50 kts
Bit of a problem here...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 10:22 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
Ah...*runs back to drawing board*

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 4:02 pm
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
Well...

At a block coefficient of 0.800, she looks like one of the tugboat barges I so often see out on the Tombigbee. Not precisely an ideal hullform for a warship- your battleship will have a hull shaped like a supertanker. ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 11:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
Oh.... fixed and gave the ship more of a heavy cruiser style hull

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 11:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
...you know what this is sounding like, actually?

[ img ]

Do note that they were built to comply with treaty restrictions (though the Germans lied about them anyway)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 11:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
Yeah They will be quite like the Deutschland class,except:

*8.5 knots slower
*much more heavily armoured (nearly double)
*6500km range (they would only roam the North sea and the Baltic)
*100 feet shorter,3.5 feet thinner, 7.5 feet shallower

and probably older control systems etc


Not sure for a name, "Weimar" probably wouldn't do

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 24th, 2011, 2:28 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
The speed would be far, far more useful than a 10" armor belt that's only 12' high.
I'd go with protection against a 6" opponent, and try to squeeze out as much speed as possible. Then you start seeing the necessity for a 'disproportionate commitment' on your enemy's part; you have a cruiser with extremely big guns and decent armor... you need a battlecruiser or a cruiser squadron to kill it, and unlike the Deutschland it will be hard for most cruisers to catch. Heck, I might even drop down to 2x2x280mm and give her a respectable secondary of 12x1x150mm. Or, you could potentially recycle some of the old 170mm/L40 guns from the old pre-dreads as secondaries (as a cost-saving measure) since these ships would be mostly for use against merchants.

Actually, since the 'modern' version of the 280mm doesn't exist as of 1924, I'd figure that the main battery would also have to be scavenged off the old pre-dreads as well... again, call it 'cost-saving' measure in a nation that is probably rather opposed to any major military spending.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 24th, 2011, 3:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
so....

reduce armour to 6"-7" main belt?
2x2x280mm main, scavenged
speed up 30knts?
6x1x170mm secondary

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: "Treaty of Versailles" Battleship for GermanyPosted: May 24th, 2011, 4:45 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
What I am saying is that the Deutschland was too great a compromise- too slow to outrun a cruiser which could sink her, and too lightly armed and armored to fight a battlecruiser... which she could not escape. Germany would either need a linienschiffe made to fight a battleship, or a commerce raider which could keep pace with a cruiser. The Deutschland tried to be both... and achieved neither.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]